Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 69Advanced Authentication Protocols SecurityWireless Networks and ProtocolsNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Study on MITM (Man in the Middle) Vulnerability in Wireless Network Using 802.1X and EAP

Hwang, Hyunuk, Jung, Gyeok, Sohn, Kiwook, Park, Sangseo·2008·2008 International Conference on Information Science and Security (ICISS 2008)

Abstract

The security of wireless LAN is being strengthened through a combination of EAP with an 802.1X-based authentication server, with 802.11i as the standard. As such a security technique effectively defends the existing WEP or protocol vulnerabilities, another approach is needed to prove the vulnerability of the wireless LAN. This paper proposes the wireless MITM (man in the middle) framework, which can actively prove the vulnerability of MITM by applying the MITM technique in the wireless LAN environment, whose security is applied using 802.1X and EAP. It also describes the designing of the required functions and modules. This paper proposes that it is possible to collect the wireless LAN authentication information of the unauthorized user using the designed wireless MLTM-framework under the EAP-MD5 and EAP-TTLS environment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iciss.2008.10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. blunk, 1998, PPP Extensible Authentication Protocol(EAP) IETF RFC 2284
  2. dierks, 1999, The TLS protocol version 1 0 IETF RFC 2246
  3. calhoun, 2000, PPP EAP TLS Authentication Protocol IETF RFC 2794
  4. funk, 2002, EAP Tunneled TLS Authentication Protocol
  5. blunk, 1998, RFC 2284 - PPP Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
  6. bellardo, 0, 802.11 Denial of Service Attacks: Real Vulnerabilities and Practical Solutions, Proc USENIX
  7. 0, IEEE 802 1 Working Group 802 1X - port based network access control
  8. 2004, Wi-Fi Alliance
  9. 10.17487/rfc2865 · DOI
  10. 2002, Foundary NETWORKS, Using IEEE 802 1x to enhance network security
  11. fluhrer, 2001, Weakness in the key scheduling algorithm of RC4, Eighth Annual Workshop on Selected Areas in Cryptography, 10.1007/3-540-45537-X_1 · DOI
  12. walker, 2000, Unsafe at Any Key Size: an Analysis of the WEP Encapsulation, Tech report 03628E IEEE 802 11 Committee
  13. simon, 2000, RADIUS Master Session Key Attribute

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hwang, H., Jung, G., Sohn, K., & Park, S.
Affiliations
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
Venue
2008 International Conference on Information Science and Security (ICISS 2008)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2008-01
Pages
164-170
OpenAlex
W2160395257
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Information Science and Security (ICISS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
man-in-the-middle attacks, wireless LAN security, IEEE 802.1X, Extensible Authentication Protocol, EAP-TLS, wireless network authentication, 802.11i

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.