Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 718

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance

Open access
Aspert, N., Santa-Cruz, D., Ebrahimi, T.·2003·Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo

Abstract

This paper proposes an efficient method to estimate the distance between discrete 3D surfaces represented by triangular 3D meshes. The metric used is based on an approximation of the Hausdorff distance, which has been appropriately implemented in order to reduce unnecessary computation and memory usage. Results show that when compared to similar tools, a significant gain in both memory and speed can be achieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icme.2002.1035879

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 718

Metadata

Authors
Aspert, N., Santa-Cruz, D., & Ebrahimi, T.
Venue
Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2003-06-25
Pages
705-708
OpenAlex
W2169371923
Cited by
718
References
0
FWCI
65.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icme.2002.1035879
The paper
Aspert, N., Santa-Cruz, D., & Ebrahimi, T. (2003). MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance. Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. https://doi.org/10.1109/icme.2002.1035879

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.