Cited by 317Image Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising Methods

Zero-Shot Restoration of Underexposed Images via Robust Retinex Decomposition

Zhu, Anqi, Zhang, Lin, Shen, Ying, Ma, Yong, Zhao, Shengjie, Zhou, Yicong·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)

Abstract

Underexposed images often suffer from serious quality degradation such as poor visibility and latent noise in the dark. Most previous methods for underexposed images restoration ignore the noise and amplify it during stretching contrast. We predict the noise explicitly to achieve the goal of denoising while restoring the underexposed image. Specifically, a novel three-branch convolution neural network, namely RRDNet (short for Robust Retinex Decomposition Network), is proposed to decompose the input image into three components, illumination, reflectance and noise. As an image-specific network, RRDNet doesn't need any prior image examples or prior training. Instead, the weights of RRDNet will be updated by a zero-shot scheme of iteratively minimizing a specially designed loss function. Such a loss function is devised to evaluate the current decomposition of the test image and guide noise estimation. Experiments demonstrate that RRDNet can achieve robust correction with overall naturalness and pleasing visual quality. To make the results reproducible, the source code has been made publicly available at https://aaaaangel.github.io/RRDNet-Homepage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icme46284.2020.9102962

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, A., Zhang, L., Shen, Y., Ma, Y., Zhao, S., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Jiangxi Normal University (CN)
  • University of Macau (MO)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-07
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3034895805
Cited by
317
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
zero-shot learning, Retinex decomposition, illumination-reflectance decomposition, noise estimation, image denoising, contrast enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review