The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deepfake Detection: Current Challenges and Next Steps
Open accessAbstract
High quality fake videos and audios generated by AI- algorithms (the deep fakes) have started to challenge the status of videos and audios as definitive evidence of events. In this paper, we highlight a few of these challenges and discuss the research opportunities in this direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The authors of many surveys (e.g., Lyu, 2020; Younus and Hasan, 2020; Deshmukh and Wankhade, 2021; Masood et al., 2023; Sandotra and Arora, 2024), argued that better (higher-quality, more up-to-date, and more standard) deepfake datasets are needed to develop more effective deepfake detection methods.”
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as Lyu, 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The author tried to raise a deep concern about one of the critical disadvantages of the current DeepFake generation methods that cannot produce a fine mapping of color shades for hair with respect to the human face.”
From A Comprehensive Review of DeepFake Detection Using Advanced Machine Learning and Fusion Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lyu (2020) and Masood et al. (2023) also suggested that we need to consider social media laundering effects in training data and improve the evaluation of datasets.”
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as Lyu, 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“some used a broader definition, e.g., Lyu (2020) defined deepfake as “high quality fake videos and audios generated by AI algorithms.””
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as Lyu, 2020
In the citing paper
“traditional digital media forensics, which often rely on image metadata (14) that are not available for many of today’s most concerning deepfakes, which typically appear first on social media platforms stripped of such metadata (15, 16).”
From Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks
Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00453 · Cited by 11,714
Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation
Karras, T., Aila, T., Laine, S., & Lehtinen, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.10196 · Cited by 4,727
FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images
Rossler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Niessner, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00009 · Cited by 3,314
MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Network
Afchar, D., Nozick, V., Yamagishi, J., & Echizen, I. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) · doi:10.1109/wifs.2018.8630761 · Cited by 1,872
Celeb-DF: A Large-Scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics
Li, Y., Yang, X., Sun, P., Qi, H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00327 · Cited by 1,846 · cited 2×
“In a recent work [27], we present a new large-scale challenging DeepFake video dataset, Celeb-DF, which contains 5, 639 high-quality DeepFake videos of celebrities generated using improved synthesis process.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationDeepfake Video Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Guera, D., & Delp, E. J. (2018) · 2018 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS) · doi:10.1109/avss.2018.8639163 · Cited by 1,285
Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Poses
Yang, X., Li, Y., & Lyu, S. (2019) · ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8683164 · Cited by 1,196
Self-citationIn Ictu Oculi: Exposing AI Created Fake Videos by Detecting Eye Blinking
Li, Y., Chang, M.-C., & Lyu, S. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) · doi:10.1109/wifs.2018.8630787 · Cited by 1,089
Self-citationCapsule-forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videos
Nguyen, H. H., Yamagishi, J., & Echizen, I. (2019) · ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8682602 · Cited by 951
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–235 of 235
Sheikh, M. F. A., Bhuyan, A. S., Dhiman, A., Sharma, C., Diya, Joshi, M., & Ritu, R. (2024) · Asian Conference on Intelligent Technologies (ACOIT) · doi:10.1109/acoit62457.2024.10941577
Charpe, A. (2025) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.71021
Unraveling Reality: The Impact of Deepfakes on Trust and Perception
Kosarkar, U. P., & Chaube, A. (2024) · doi:10.69758/gimrj2407ii0iv12p0001
Identifying Machine-Generated Tweets with Deep Learning and FastText Embeddings on Social Media
Sasikanth, M. M., Ajaykumar, M., Mohan, M., Reddy, M. G. L., & Reddy, M. K. G. (2025) · Industrial Engineering Journal · doi:10.36893/iej.2025.v54i05.005
Deep Forgery Detection Based on Staged Differential Feature Enhancement
Long, M., & Lin, Y. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9946-9_4
Representation Alignment For Deepfake Detection
Li, Z., Tang, W., Gao, S., Wang, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00109
A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Deep Learning Techniques for Detecting Deepfake Audio
Arya, G., Tyagi, S. S., Nayak, T., & Sharma, T. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7131-1_6
The impacts of deepfakes on journalism: Risks, opportunities, and changes in news organizations
Raemy, P., & Puppis, M. (2025) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2024-0211
Singh, R., & Agarwal, R. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03751-0_34
The Face of the Algorithmic Image: Early Film Theory and Deepfakes
Levin, O. (2025) · Quarterly Review of Film and Video · doi:10.1080/10509208.2025.2564533
Wang, Y., Liang, Y., Ma, B., Zhang, P., & Wang, J. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4381-6_32
RetractedHybrid DCGAN-ResNet50 Model for Fake Face Detection
Bapatla, V. M. S., & Mogalla, S. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12834-8_13 · Cited by 2
Sharma, A., Paserlanka, D. B., Lankadasu, N. V. Y., Sharma, S., & Malik, A. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0877-7.ch010
Effect of Spoof Speech on Forensic Voice Comparison Using Deep Speaker Embeddings
Alsalihi, M. H., & Sztahó, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07956-5_21
Effect of Compression on the Detection of Deepfake Videos with Facial Features
Jadhav, C., Ratnaparkhe, V. R., & Kumar, R. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9932-2_39
Forensic Applications of Generative AI in Image Reconstruction
Sankhyadhar, S., Pandey, M., Saraswat, B. K., & Tripathi, E. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3795-1.ch003
Face Forgery Detection Based on ResNet Networks
Li, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT) · doi:10.1109/iccasit66611.2025.11348796
Spot the Fake: Vision Transformers in the Fight Against DeepFakes
Pandya, K., & DAHIYA, V. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17837-4_24
Diffusion Based Face Generation via Image Editing and Image Morphing
Fan, L., & Roberson, J. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) · doi:10.1109/tps-isa67132.2025.00030
Wei, W. C. T., & Teo, J. (2025) · International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering · doi:10.1109/iccce66530.2025.11474034
Kirui, P., & Zhou, B. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19488-6_14
Методы обнаружения дипфейков в видеоконференциях в реальном времени
Кузьменко, И. Д., Намиот, Д. Е., & Васенин, В. А. (2025) · Sovremennye informacionnye tehnologii i IT-obrazovanie. · doi:10.25559/sitito.021.202502.204-220
Explainable Deepfake Video Detection Using Visual, Temporal, Physiological, and Audio-Visual Cues
Bhatia, A., Ibrahim Mohamed, S., Gokulsivaraj, V. P., & Krishnan, K. (2026) · International Conference on Recent Advances in Electrical, Electronics, Ubiquitous Communication, and Computational Intelligence (RAEEUCCI) · doi:10.1109/raeeucci67649.2026.11504825
Prestby, T. J., Jang, E., & Pacheco, A. (2026) · International Journal of Cartography · doi:10.1080/23729333.2026.2655716
Cardoso, P. M. C., Oliveira, R. S., Gomes, T. F. N., Bastos, E. S., & Lopes, S. F. S. F. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7660-8.ch015
Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review of Methods, Datasets, Metrics, and Open Research Challenges
Singh, B. P., & Singh, H. (2026) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23544-2_17
Lu, Y., Mei, Y., Wang, W. H., Chen, X., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Feng, X., & Chen, J. (2026) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas66217.2026.11562012
DeepGuard: A Lightweight Dual-CNN Ensemble for Practical Deepfake Video Detection
Dombale, A., Sahu, N., Sahuji, P., Rana, A., & Sali, M. (2026) · International Conference on Inventive Computing and Informatics (ICICI) · doi:10.1109/icici68773.2026.11581015
A Hierarchical Multi-Signal Fusion Framework for Interpretable Deepfake Detection
Sriram, D., Shree, M. H. N., & Poongothai, E. (2026) · International conference Computer Networks and Inventive Communication Technologies · doi:10.1109/iccnct68477.2026.11590185
Deepfake Detection using Deep Learning
Kumar, R., Baitha, A. K., & Singh, S. (2026) · International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) · doi:10.1109/iccmc69250.2026.11625184
B, S. S. N., & Sunil Kumar Aithal, S. (2026) · International Conference on Inventive Computation and Information Technologies (ICICIT) · doi:10.1109/icicit69063.2026.11634019
Sudharsana, P. P., & Rajalaxmi, R. R. (2026) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.1177/1088467x261472132
Defakeit: AI-Powered Deepfake Media Detection Model and Anti-spoofing System
Saraswat, A., Yadav, K., Pandey, S., Thakur, A., & Kumar, A. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31097-2_28
Nayak, P., Vaishnavi, B. S., & Kumar, L. K. S. (2026) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-026-21912-4
Artificial Intelligence and the Death of the Author:
Aleksandruk, I., Palchevska, O. S., & Андрощук, А. Г. (2026) · Dia-noesis. · doi:10.12681/dia.46959
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyu, S.
- Affiliations
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lyu, Siwei
- ORCID
- Lyu, Siwei
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-07
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W3012725859
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- IEEE RESOURCE CENTERS
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, synthetic media, fake videos, AI-generated content, digital evidence, misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review