Randomized Sampling for Large Data Applications of SVM
Abstract
A trend in machine learning is the application of existing algorithms to ever-larger datasets. Support Vector Machines (SVM) have been shown to be very effective, but have been difficult to scale to large-data problems. Some approaches have sought to scale SVM training by approximating and parallelizing the underlying quadratic optimization problem. This paper pursues a different approach. Our algorithm, which we call Sampled SVM, uses an existing SVM training algorithm to create a new SVM training algorithm. It uses randomized data sampling to better extend SVMs to large data applications. Experiments on several datasets show that our method is faster than and comparably accurate to both the original SVM algorithm it is based on and the Cascade SVM, the leading data organization approach for SVMs in the literature. Further, we show that our approach is more amenable to parallelization than Cascade SVM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Random sampling algorithms' performance is uncertain because some support vectors may not be included in the randomly selected subset.
“Although their experiments show that these methods are faster than the original SVM, the performance of these randomly sampling algorithms is uncertain since some support vectors may not be included in the randomly selected subset.”
From An efficient instance selection algorithm to reconstruct training set for support vector machine (2017) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
Balcázar, J., Dai, Y., & Watanabe, O. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45583-3_11 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An efficient instance selection algorithm to reconstruct training set for support vector machine
Liu, C., Wang, W., Wang, M., Lv, F., & Konan, M. (2017) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.10.031 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferragut, E. M., & Laska, J.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Laska, Jason
- Venue
- 2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 350-355
- OpenAlex
- W2154627027
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- support vector machine, large-scale data, randomized sampling, parallelization, quadratic programming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review