Cited by 16Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesMachine Learning and Data ClassificationMachine Learning and Algorithms

Randomized Sampling for Large Data Applications of SVM

Ferragut, Erik M., Laska, Jason·2012·2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications

Abstract

A trend in machine learning is the application of existing algorithms to ever-larger datasets. Support Vector Machines (SVM) have been shown to be very effective, but have been difficult to scale to large-data problems. Some approaches have sought to scale SVM training by approximating and parallelizing the underlying quadratic optimization problem. This paper pursues a different approach. Our algorithm, which we call Sampled SVM, uses an existing SVM training algorithm to create a new SVM training algorithm. It uses randomized data sampling to better extend SVMs to large data applications. Experiments on several datasets show that our method is faster than and comparably accurate to both the original SVM algorithm it is based on and the Cascade SVM, the leading data organization approach for SVMs in the literature. Further, we show that our approach is more amenable to parallelization than Cascade SVM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icmla.2012.65

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Random sampling algorithms' performance is uncertain because some support vectors may not be included in the randomly selected subset.

    “Although their experiments show that these methods are faster than the original SVM, the performance of these randomly sampling algorithms is uncertain since some support vectors may not be included in the randomly selected subset.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferragut, E. M., & Laska, J.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Venue
2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-12
Volume
8
Pages
350-355
OpenAlex
W2154627027
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
support vector machine, large-scale data, randomized sampling, parallelization, quadratic programming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review