Cited by 4Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The potential of vision-language models for content moderation of children’s videos

Open access
Ahmed, Syed Hammad, Hu, Shengnan, Sukthankar, Gita·2023·2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)

Abstract

Natural language supervision has been shown to be effective for zero-shot learning in many computer vision tasks, such as object detection and activity recognition. However, generating informative prompts can be challenging for more subtle tasks, such as video content moderation. This can be difficult, as there are many reasons why a video might be inappropriate, beyond violence and obscenity. For example, scammers may attempt to create junk content that is similar to popular educational videos but with no meaningful information. This paper evaluates the performance of several CLIP variations for content moderation of children's cartoons in both the supervised and zero-shot setting. We show that our proposed model (Vanilla CLIP with Projection Layer) outperforms previous work conducted on the Malicious or Benign (MOB) benchmark for video content moderation. This paper presents an in depth analysis of how context-specific language prompts affect content moderation performance. Our results indicate that it is important to include more context in content moderation prompts, particularly for cartoon videos as they are not well represented in the CLIP training data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icmla58977.2023.00186

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Donchev, 2023, 40 Mind Blowing YouTube Facts, Figures and Statistics - 2023
  2. Auxier, 2020, Parenting children in the age of screens
  3. Placido, 2017, YouTubes “Elsagate” illuminates the unintended horrors of the digital age, Forbes, 11
  4. 10.4236/jss.2015.39033 · DOI
  5. 2023, Important info for parents about YouTube Kids
  6. 10.1145/3511808.3557442 · DOI
  7. 10.32473/flairs.36.133315 · DOI
  8. Radford, 2021, Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision
  9. Wang, 2021, ActionCLIP: A new paradigm for video action recognition, arXiv preprint
  10. 10.1145/3503161.3549201 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/3501247.3531556 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3147519 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/3297280.3297487 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/3442442.3452314 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s11042-022-12709-2 · DOI
  16. Jia, 2021, Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision
  17. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.510 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00633 · DOI
  19. Yang, 2023, AIM: Adapting image models for efficient video action recognition
  20. Kaliamoorthi, 2019, Prado: Projection attention networks for document classification on-device, 10.18653/v1/D19-1506 · DOI
  21. Sankar, 2020, Proformer: Towards on-device lsh projection based transformers, arXiv preprint
  22. Frome, 2013, Devise: A deep visual-semantic embedding model, Advances in neural information processing systems, 26
  23. Kay, 2017, The Kinetics Human Action Video Dataset
  24. Agrawal, 1994, Fast algorithms for mining association rules, 1215, 487
  25. Soomro, 2012, UCF101: A Dataset of 101 Human Actions Classes From Videos in The Wild
  26. Krizhevsky, 2009, Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images
  27. 10.1007/978-3-642-42051-1_16 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.502 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298878 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lattman, 2007, The origins of Justice Stewarts I know it when I see it

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Ahmed, S. H., Hu, S., & Sukthankar, G.
Affiliations
University of Central Florida (US)
Venue
2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-12-15
Pages
1237-1241
OpenAlex
W4392943349
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
video content moderation, children's animation, vision-language models, CLIP, zero-shot learning, natural language supervision, prompt engineering, projection layer, educational videos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The potential of vision-language models for content moderation of children’s videos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icmla58977.2023.00186
The paper
Ahmed, S. H., Hu, S., & Sukthankar, G. (2023). The potential of vision-language models for content moderation of children’s videos. 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icmla58977.2023.00186