The DOI matches its Crossref record.
K-9 Artificial Intelligence Education in Qingdao: Issues, Challenges and Suggestions
Abstract
Nowadays, AI education from Kindergarten to 9thgrade(K-9) is in full swing in China, but many challenges exist, such as fragmented AI curricula, ineffective teaching tools, and uneven educational resources in urban and rural areas, etc. So this paper presents an in-depth study of the current status of K-9 AI education in Qingdao area through questionnaires, expert discussions, and field visits to sort out existing problems and then put forward corresponding advice and suggestions. Collected data is then analyzed from the perspectives of government, schools, teachers, students and parents, respectively. Results show that AI-related educational activities have been carried out in Qingdao area to improve students' AI literacy. But efforts are still needed to make such education more systematic, standardized, and personalized. Finally the paper made a list of recommendations corresponding to these needed efforts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teaching challenges for AI literacy include insufficient funding, immature AI curricula, tools and evaluation methods, and technical concerns about whether schools' internet infrastructure is ready for students to compile AI-enabled algorithms and applications.
“They also need to consider various teaching challenges such as insufficient funding, immature AI curricula, tools and evaluation methods (Gong et al., 2020), as well as technical concerns that whether their schools' internet infrastructure is ready for students to compile AI-enabled algorithms and applications (Vazhayil et al., 2019).”
From Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2020
Researchers introduced children to AI concepts in playful and inquiry approaches via high-order thinking activities such as creating digital stories, performing Turing Test with intelligent agents, creating chatbot and inference algorithms, and building applications through blockly-based programming.
“For example, researchers introduced children to AI concepts in playful and inquiry approaches via high-order thinking activities such as creating digital stories (Kandlhofer et al., 2016), performing Turing Test with intelligent agents, creating chatbot and inference algorithms (Wong et al., 2020), and building applications through blockly-based programming (Gong et al., 2020).”
From Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2020
Gong et al. found that students pay little attention to ethical concerns such as bias in AI and legal responsibility, and intellectual property.
“Gong et al. (2020) found that students pay little attention to ethical concerns such as bias in AI and legal responsibility, and intellectual property.”
From Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review (2021) · cites this paper as Gong et al. (2020)
Gong et al. (2020) found that students pay little attention to ethical concerns such as bias in AI and legal responsibility (8%), and intellectual property (9%).
“Gong et al. (2020) found that students pay little attention to ethical concerns such as bias in AI and legal responsibility (8%), and intellectual property (9%).”
From Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students (2022) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- feiyue, 2019, iSTREAM intelligent aviation science popularization education system for elementary and middle school students, [EB-OL]
- yuan, 2017, Parallel Blockchain Concept Methods and Issues[J] in Chinese ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 43, 1703
- xiaoyan, 2018, Parallel-Education-Blockchain Driven Smart Education: Challenges and Issues, The China Automation Congress 2018 10 1109/CAC, 2390
- 0, The Chinese Association of Automation Move forward for love - China Association of Automation enters Wuzhen Central Primary School in Shaanxi Province [EB/OL]
- 0, AI Singapore, 2018
- 0, Japan's Rejuvenation Strategy 2016 Facing the Fourth Industrial Revolution, 2016
- 0, Notice of the Ministry of Education on Printing and Distributing the Educational Informationization 2.0 Action Plan, [EB-OL]
- 0, New-generation artificial intelligence development plan, Chinese [EB-OL]
- 0, iFLYTEK released the first junior high school version of AI teaching materials, [EB-OL]
- 0, Artificial Intelligence Textbook (High School Edition), [EB-OL]
- 0, Growing the Artificial Intelligence Industry in the UK, 2017
- 0, Every Student Succeeds, Law Sweeping Legislation Will Bolster Computer Science in K-12 Education[EB/OL], 2016
- 0, The first set of Artificial Intelligence Series for Primary and Middle Schools, [EB-OL]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041 · Cited by 2,205
Boscardin, C. K., Gin, B., Golde, P. B., & Hauer, K. E. (2024) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005439 · Cited by 620
AI Literacy: Definition, Teaching, Evaluation and Ethical Issues
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. S. (2021) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.487 · Cited by 537
Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students
Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054 · Cited by 266
Explicating AI Literacy of Employees at Digital Workplaces
Cetindamar, D., Kitto, K., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., Abedin, B., & Knight, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3138503 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, X., Tang, Y., Liu, X., Jing, S., Cui, W., Liang, J., & Wang, F.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-10-30
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W3097265104
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, AI literacy, teaching aids, educational resource inequality, urban-rural education gap, Qingdao, student and teacher perceptions, parental attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review