Secrecy Performance of the UAV Enabled Cognitive Relay Network
Open accessAbstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been recently applied to improve physical-layer security in wireless communication networks. This work considers a cognitive relay network where UAV is used as a mobile relay to bridge the communication from a secondary transmitter to a secondary receiver. Our purpose is to maximize the secrecy rate under certain UAV trajectory and power constraints by designing a joint optimization algorithm. Solving the optimization problem is computationally challenging as the utility functions are non-concave and constraints are non-convex. Thus, an efficient iterative convex approximation algorithm based on a successive optimization approach is introduced to address the proposed non-convex optimization problems. The computer simulations show that our algorithm can achieve a rapid coverage rate and the UAV trajectory is optimized successfully. Results in this study demonstrate that the proposed design outperforms conventional schemes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
China has recently exploited the mobility of drones to improve the provisions of medical supplies.
“More interesting, China has recently exploited the mobility of drones [173] to improve the provisions of medical supplies [174].”
From Blockchain and AI-Based Solutions to Combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Like Epidemics: A Survey (2021) · cites this paper as [173]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Chi-Nguyen, D., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication and Information Systems (ICCIS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-12
- Pages
- 117-121
- OpenAlex
- W2917492327
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- International Conference on Communication and Information Systems (ICCIS) (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Age of Information Optimization
- Keywords
- unmanned aerial vehicles, physical layer security, secrecy rate maximization, cognitive relay networks, UAV trajectory optimization, power constraints, non-convex optimization, successive convex approximation, iterative optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review