Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 84Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsAntimicrobial agents and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibiofilm activity of nano sized CuO

Sriyutha Murthy, P., Venugopalan, V.P., Arunya, Das D., Dhara, S., Pandiyan, R., Tyagi, A.K.·2011·International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)

Abstract

Antibiofilm properties of bulk and nano-sized copper oxide (CuO) were investigated using four species of bacteria viz: Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeuriginosa (PAO1) and Pseudomonas putida. The effect of both commercial and synthesized nanoparticles on biofilm formation was investigated using different concentrations 0.02, 0.12, 0.24, 0.5, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 & 1.8 µg / mL). Both bulk (91% reduction) and nano-sized (93% reduction) particles significantly reduced biofilm formation in all the four species of bacteria. Concentration and size/shape of nanoparticles seemed to influence biofilm inhibition. Increase in NP concentration from 0.02 to 1.8 µg/mL resulted in a marginal increase in inhibition. While a similar increase in concentration of bulk particles, resulted in 18% decrease in biofilm inhibition. Differences in biofilm inhibition between bulk and nano-sized particles were marginal at low concentrations (0.02, 0.12 & 0.24 µg/mL), whereas prominent differences were observed from concentration of 0.5 µg/mL onwards for the bulk particles. The decrease in inhibition efficiency of bulk nanoparticles with increase in concentration may be attributed to the differences in size, shape, aggregation and settling behaviour. In general, higher efficiency was observed with S. aureus, E. coli and P. putida biofilms, whereas P. aeuriginosa cells showed more resistance in the presence of CuO nanoparticles. Results of the present study indicated that size and shape of the nanoparticles, seem to have an influence on the effective concentration, required for inhibition of biofilms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iconset.2011.6168037

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.047 · DOI
  2. 10.1128/AEM.68.6.2950-2958.2002 · DOI
  3. 10.1063/1.3606120 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00656.x · DOI
  5. 10.1128/AEM.00710-08 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00353-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165 · DOI
  8. 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4349-4352.2001 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/08927014.2011.597051 · DOI
  10. siel, 2011, Reduced Staphylococcus auresu proliferation and biofilm formation on zinc oxide nanoparticle PVC composite surfaces, Acta Biomaterialia, 7, 2579, 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.018 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/0892701031000072190 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nrmicro821 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. tremaroli, 2011, A histidine-kinase cheA gene of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KF707 not only has a key role in chemotaxis but also affects biofilm formation and cell metabolism, Biofouling, 27, 3346, 10.1080/08927014.2010.537099 · DOI
  16. 10.1128/JB.183.22.6579-6589.2001 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/bit.21838 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nrmicro1838 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/08927014.2011.579599 · DOI

Cited by

See all 84

Metadata

Authors
Sriyutha Murthy, P., Venugopalan, V. P., Arunya, D. D., Dhara, S., Pandiyan, R., & Tyagi, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Biofouling & Biofilm Processes Section, Water & Steam, Chemistry Division, BARC Facilities, IGCAR Campus, Kalpakkam 603 102, INDIA
  • Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (IN)
  • Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IN)
Venue
International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-11
Pages
580-583
OpenAlex
W2076042457
Cited by
84
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
copper oxide nanoparticles, antibiofilm activity, biofilm inhibition, nanoparticle size and shape, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, nanoparticle concentration dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.