Cited by 36Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Neurobiological evaluation of thin-film longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes as a peripheral nerve interface,

Navarro, Xavier, Lago, Natalia, Vivo, Meritxell, Yoshida, Ken, Koch, Klaus P., Poppendieck, Wigand, Micera, Silvestro·2007·2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics

Abstract

Longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes (LIFEs) designed to be placed inside a peripheral nerve seem adequate devices for constituting a nerve-prosthesis interface. In this study we evaluated the functional and morphological effects of newly designed polyimide-based thin-film (tf-)LIFEs implanted in the rat sciatic nerve for 3 months. The tf-LIFEs used are highly flexible, and have 8 regularly spaced contacts, 4 at each side of the folded structure. Functional results at 1 month showed a mild decline in nerve conduction velocity and amplitude of muscle responses, which recovered during the following 2 months. Histological results showed a mild scar response around the intraneural electrode, but no signs of axonal loss and degeneration. Longitudinally implanted LIFEs behaved slightly better than transversally inserted LIFEs. Acute experiments proved that selective neural signal recording and nerve stimulation could be achieved from the different active sites in one tf-LIFE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icorr.2007.4428492

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • tfLIFEs functional decline due to surgical implantation and mechanical damage was slight and reversible after 3 months.

    “Navarro et al. showed that tfLIFEs functional decline due to surgical implantation and mechanical damage was slight and reversible after 3 months.”

    From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2007

  • Histological evaluation in a rat model after several months showed a mild inflammatory reaction and no evidence of nerve degeneration for tfLIFEs.

    “Moreover, histological evaluation in a rat model after several months showed a mild inflammatory reaction and no evidence of nerve degeneration (Navarro et al., 2007).”

    From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2007

  • Spatial resolution decreases after implantation because an inflammatory tissue response damages nerve cells and creates an insulating layer between the nerve and the electrode.

    “Lastly, the spatial resolution decreases after implantation because of an inflammatory tissue response around the electrode, which can damage the nerve cells and create an insulating layer between the nerve and the electrode (Navarro et al., 2007; Christensen et al., 2014; Kundu et al., 2014b).”

    From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Navarro et al., 2007

  • Longitudinally implanted thin-film longitudinal intra-fascicular electrodes showed less functional decline compared to transversally implanted ones during in vivo testing.

    “Although, longitudinally implanted tf-LIFEs showed less functional decline compared to transversally implanted ones during in vivo testing [90].”
  • In a rat study, thin-film longitudinal intra-fascicular electrodes caused a mild functional decline during the first month attributable to nerve damage during implantation, but rats recovered after the following two months without any sign of nerve degeneration.

    “In a rat study, it caused a mild functional decline during the first month, attributable to nerve damage during implantation. Nonetheless the rats recovered after the following two months without any sign of nerve degeneration [90].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 36

Authors
Navarro, X., Lago, N., Vivo, M., Yoshida, K., Koch, K. P., Poppendieck, W., & Micera, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Institute of Neurosciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. e-mail: meritxell.vivo@uab.cat
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (DE)
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Venue
2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2007-06
Pages
643-649
ISSN
1945-7898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137910464
Cited by
36
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
thin film electrodes, peripheral nerve interfaces, polyimide electrodes, sciatic nerve, nerve conduction velocity, muscle response, scar formation, axonal loss, neural recording, neurostimulation, flexible electrodes, rat model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review