The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differentiating ability in users of the ReWalkTM powered exoskeleton: An analysis of walking kinematics
Abstract
The ReWalk(TM) powered exoskeleton assists thoracic level motor complete spinal cord injury patients who are paralyzed to walk again with an independent, functional, upright, reciprocating gait. We completed an evaluation of twelve such individuals with promising results. All subjects met basic criteria to be able to use the ReWalk(TM)--including items such as sufficient bone mineral density, leg passive range of motion, strength, body size and weight limits. All subjects received approximately the same number of training sessions. However there was a wide distribution in walking ability. Walking velocities ranged from under 0.1m/s to approximately 0.5m/s. This variability was not completely explained by injury level The remaining sources of that variability are not clear at present. This paper reports our preliminary analysis into how the walking kinematics differed across the subjects--as a first step to understand the possible contribution to the velocity range and determine if the subjects who did not walk as well could be taught to improve by mimicking the better walkers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ReWalk exoskeleton developed by ReWalk Robotics (Marlborough, MA, USA; Figure 2A) is a LEEs that provides powered hip and knee motion to enable individuals with SCI to stand upright and walk [32], [33].”
From Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Esquenazi, A., Talaty, M., Packel, A., & Saulino, M. (2012) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0b013e318269d9a3 · Cited by 958
Self-citationFührer, M. J., Rintala, D. H., Hart, K. A., Clearman, R. R., & Young, M. E. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 357
Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury
Dijkers, M. P. J. M. (1999) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90076-x · Cited by 290
A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Interventions for Pressure Ulcers After Spinal Cord Injury
Regan, M., Teasell, R. W., Wolfe, D. L., Keast, D. H., Mortenson, W. B., & Aubut, J.-A. L. (2009) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.08.212 · Cited by 179
Shoulder pain in persons with thoracic spinal cord injury: Prevalence and characteristics
Alm, M., Saraste, H., & Norrbrink, C. (2008) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0173 · Cited by 178
LIFE SATISFACTION OF PERSONS WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY COMPARED TO A POPULATION GROUP
Post, M. W. M. (1998) · Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/003655098444282 · Cited by 167
Bone mineral status in paraplegic patients who do or do not perform standing
Goemaere, S., Laere, M. V., Neve, P. D., & Kaufman, J. (1994) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/bf01623058 · Cited by 151
Spinal Cord Injury Medicine. 3. Rehabilitation Phase After Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Kirshblum, S., Priebe, M. M., Ho, C., Scelza, W. M., Chiodo, A. E., & Wuermser, L.-A. (2007) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.003 · Cited by 146
Reciprocating gait orthoses: A multicenter study of their use by spinal cord injured patients
Franceschini, M., Baratta, S., Zampolini, M., Loria, D., & Lotta, S. (1997) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90422-6 · Cited by 65
Chapter 3 Electrical stimulation for therapy and mobility after spinal cord injury
Stein, R. B., Chong, S. L., James, K. B., Kido, A., Bell, G. J., Tubman, L. A., & Bélanger, M. (2002) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(02)37005-5 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- esquenazi, 2002, Normal and pathological gait analysis, Physical Medicine &Rehabilitation The Complete Approach 2000
- chafetz, 2008, Lower limb orthoses for persons with spinal cord injuriy, AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices
- 0, Resources for Entertainment Education Content Developers
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons
Yan, T., Cempini, M., Oddo, C. M., & Vitiello, N. (2014) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.032 · Cited by 721
Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons
Chen, B., Ma, H., Qin, L.-Y., Gao, F., Chan, K.-M., Law, S.-W., Qin, L., & Liao, W.-H. (2016) · Journal of Orthopaedic Translation · doi:10.1016/j.jot.2015.09.007 · Cited by 501
“The ReWalk exoskeleton developed by ReWalk Robotics (Marlborough, MA, USA; Figure 2A) is a LEEs that provides powered hip and knee motion to enable individuals with SCI to stand upright and walk [32,33].”
MethodMiller, L. E., Zimmermann, A. K., & Herbert, W. G. (2016) · Medical Devices Evidence and Research · doi:10.2147/mder.s103102 · Cited by 319
Development of Active Lower Limb Robotic-Based Orthosis and Exoskeleton Devices: A Systematic Review
Kalita, B., Narayan, J., & Dwivedy, S. K. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00662-9 · Cited by 205
Lajeunesse, V., Vincent, C., Routhier, F., Careau, E., & Michaud, F. (2015) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1080766 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Talaty, M., Esquenazi, A., & Briceno, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
- Universidad Simón Bolívar (VE)
- ORCID
- Esquenazi, Alberto
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 2013
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 1945-7898 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123950545
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, gait kinematics, walking speed, gait training, gait imitation, assistive robotics
- MeSH terms
- Ankle Joint, Biomechanical Phenomena, Hip Joint, Humans, Robotics, Spinal Cord Injuries, Task Performance and Analysis, Range of Motion, Articular, Walking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
