The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Code-Comment Inconsistencies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures: Third Edition
Sheskin, D. J. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9781420036268 · Cited by 1,551
Measuring Program Comprehension: A Large-Scale Field Study with Professionals
Xia, X., Bao, L., Lo, D., Xing, Z., Hassan, A. E., & Li, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2017.2734091 · Cited by 326
Research works printed but not linked: 64
- 0, Commit to alluxio project on GitHub
- 0, Project spotbugs on GitHub
- 10.1145/51607.51609 · DOI
- fowler, 1999, Refactoring Improving the Design of Existing Code
- holm, 1979, A simple sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65
- 0, Project findbugs on GitHub
- 0, Project spring-petclinic on GitHub
- 0, Project java-design-patterns on GitHub
- 10.1145/2597073.2597074 · DOI
- 0, Commit to guava project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to classgraph project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to elasticsearch-hadoop project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to groovy project on GitHub
- 0, About stars (GitHub)
- 0, Commit to groovy project on GitHub
- 10.1109/MTD.2015.7332619 · DOI
- 0, Commit to openmrs-core project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to crate project on GitHub
- 0, Replication Package
- 10.1145/1085313.1085331 · DOI
- 10.1145/1083142.1083152 · DOI
- 10.1109/MSR.2017.63 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10664-014-9344-6 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE.2017.11 · DOI
- 10.1145/1639950.1640047 · DOI
- 10.1109/SANER.2016.72 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3183440.3183478 · DOI
- 0, Commit to javaparser project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to opennms project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to alluxio project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to android project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to groovy project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to groovy project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to psi-probe project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to voltdb project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to wordpress-android project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to findbugs project on GitHub
- 10.1109/ICPC.2013.6613836 · DOI
- 10.1145/1137983.1138030 · DOI
- 0, Commit to alluxio project on GitHub
- 10.1109/WCRE.2007.21 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11219-009-9075-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.019 · DOI
- 10.1145/1323293.1294276 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-13881-2_7 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICST.2012.106 · DOI
- 10.1109/ASE.2017.8115624 · DOI
- 10.1145/2642937.2642982 · DOI
- 10.1109/32.6171 · DOI
- woodfield, 0, The effect of modularization and comments on program comprehension, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software Engineering ser ICSE ‘81, 215
- 10.1007/s10664-017-9522-4 · DOI
- 10.1145/2856636.2856638 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSM.2005.59 · DOI
- 10.1109/COMPSAC.2018.00028 · DOI
- 0, Commit to cordova-android project on GitHub
- 10.1109/ICPC.2016.7503707 · DOI · Paper page
- 0, Commit to cassandra project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to gwtp project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to cordova-android project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to lucee project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to bitcoinj project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to bitcoinj project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to wordpress-android project on GitHub
- 0, Commit to qr-code-generator project on GitHub
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predictive Comment Updating With Heuristics and AST-Path-Based Neural Learning: A Two-Phase Approach
Lin, B., Wang, S., Liu, Z., Xia, X., & Mao, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3185458 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, F., Nagy, C., Bavota, G., & Lanza, M.
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-05
- Pages
- 53-64
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review