Cited by 29Augmented Reality ApplicationsDigital Transformation in IndustryTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modular augmented reality platform for smart operator in production environment

Um, Jumyung, Popper, Jens, Ruskowski, Martin·2018·2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS)

Abstract

The trend of mass customization requires highly flexible production systems, which pose a new challenge for workers. Numerous concepts using augmented reality technologies have been developed to offer support in manual assembly processes. Newer AR devices are equipped with more and more functions, such as microphones, speakers or multiple camera systems, which can be used to help workers. However, wearable devices offer only limited computational power and limited flexibility of their interface platform. This poses a challenge to heavy data transactions from various different sources and restrict the use for real-time responses, which are often necessary for applications in a factory. To overcome this limitation, the author of this paper proposes a combination of wearable devices with edge devices located on the shop floor. An augmented reality platform was constructed with modularized services by using the digital twin of the machine components and machine learning algorithms for object recognition. This is integrated in the factory environment to synchronize real machine components with their digital twin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icphys.2018.8390796

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1109/FMEC.2017.7946410 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TMM.2017.2759508 · DOI
  3. zühlke, 2009, SmartFactory-A Vision becomes Reality, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 42 4, 31, 10.3182/20090603-3-RU-2001.0578 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.351 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.042 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/MCG.2004.1297006 · DOI
  7. stoltz, 2017, Augmented Reality in Warehouse Operations: Opportunities and Barriers, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 12979, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1807 · DOI
  8. antonelli, 2015, Enhancing the Quality of Manual Sport Welding through Augmented Reality Assisted Guidance, In Proceedings of the 9th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, 556
  9. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.128 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/WESCON.1994.403622 · DOI
  11. elia, 2016, Evaluation the application of augmented reality devices in manufacturing from a process point of view: An AHP based model, Expert Systems with Applications, 63, 68, 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.07.006 · DOI
  12. 10.20870/IJVR.2010.9.2.2767 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005252 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Um, J., Popper, J., & Ruskowski, M.
Affiliations
  • SmartFactory (Germany) (DE)
  • German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DE)
Venue
2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-05
Pages
720-725
OpenAlex
W2810147626
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
augmented reality, wearable devices, edge computing, modular software platform, digital twin, object recognition, machine learning, manual assembly, smart factory, mass customization, real-time data processing, shop floor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modular augmented reality platform for smart operator in production environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icphys.2018.8390796
The paper
Um, J., Popper, J., & Ruskowski, M. (2018). Modular augmented reality platform for smart operator in production environment. 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS). https://doi.org/10.1109/icphys.2018.8390796