The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UNIPEN project of on-line data exchange and recognizer benchmarks
Abstract
We report the status of the UNIPEN project of data exchange and recognizer benchmarks started two years ago at the initiative of the International Association of Pattern Recognition (Technical Committee 11). The purpose of the project is to propose and implement solutions to the growing need of handwriting samples for online handwriting recognizers used by pen-based computers. Researchers from several companies and universities have agreed on a data format, a platform of data exchange and a protocol for recognizer benchmarks. The online handwriting data of concern may include handprint and cursive from various alphabets (including Latin and Chinese), signatures and pen gestures. These data will be compiled and distributed by the Linguistic Data Consortium. The benchmarks will be arbitrated the US National Institute of Standards and Technologies. We give a brief introduction to the UNIPEN format. We explain the protocol of data exchange and benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development
Godfrey, J. J., Holliman, E. C., & McDaniel, J. (1992) · [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1992.225858 · Cited by 2,134 · cited 1×
“In other pattern recognition fields, such as speech and optical character recognition, significant progresses have been made since large corpora of training and test data are publicly available and public competitions are organized to compare recognition techniques on a fair basis [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8].”
BackgroundThe ATIS spoken language systems pilot corpus
Hemphill, C. T., Godfrey, J. J., & Doddington, G. R. (1990) · Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language - HLT '90 · doi:10.3115/116580.116613 · Cited by 790
The DARPA 1000-word resource management database for continuous speech recognition
Price, P., Fisher, W. M., Bernstein, J., & Pallett, D. S. (2003) · ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1988.196669 · Cited by 341
The first census optical character recognition system conference
Wilkinson, R. A., Geist, J., Janet, S., Grother, P. J., Burges, C. J. C., Creecy, R., Hammond, B., Hull, J. J., Larsen, N. L., Vogl, T. P., et al. (1992) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.4912 · Cited by 158
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guyon, I., Schomaker, L., Plamondon, R., Liberman, M., & Janet, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.94CH3440-5)
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc. Press
- Published
- 2002-12-17
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 29-33
- OpenAlex
- W2147510700
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UNIPEN project of on-line data exchange and recognizer benchmarks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icpr.1994.576870
- The paper
- Guyon, I., Schomaker, L., Plamondon, R., Liberman, M., & Janet, S. (2002). UNIPEN project of on-line data exchange and recognizer benchmarks. Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.94CH3440-5). https://doi.org/10.1109/icpr.1994.576870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
