Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Similarity Measures for Trajectory Clustering in Outdoor Surveillance Scenes

Zhang Zhang, Kaiqi Huang, Tieniu Tan·2006·18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06)

Abstract

This paper compares different similarity measures used for trajectory clustering in outdoor surveillance scenes. Six similarity measures are presented and the performance is evaluated by correct clustering rate (CCR) and time cost (TC). The experimental results demonstrate that in outdoor surveillance scenes, the simpler PCA+Euclidean distance is competent for the clustering task even in case of noise, as more complex similarity measures such as DTW, LCSS are not efficient due to their high computational cost

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icpr.2006.392

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Z., Huang, K., & Tan, T.
Venue
18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006
Pages
1135-1138
ISSN
1041-3278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151263703
Cited by
240
References
0
FWCI
9.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Similarity Measures for Trajectory Clustering in Outdoor Surveillance Scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icpr.2006.392
The paper
Zhang, Z., Huang, K., & Tan, T. (2006). Comparison of Similarity Measures for Trajectory Clustering in Outdoor Surveillance Scenes. 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06). https://doi.org/10.1109/icpr.2006.392

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.