Cited by 106Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Data Classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feature Fusion for Online Mutual Knowledge Distillation

Open access
Kim, Jangho, Hyun, Minsung, Chung, Inseop, Kwak, Nojun·2021·2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)

Abstract

We propose a learning framework named Feature Fusion Learning (FFL) that efficiently trains a powerful classifier through a fusion module which combines the feature maps generated from parallel neural networks and generates meaningful feature maps. Specifically, we train a number of parallel neural networks as sub-networks, then we combine the feature maps from each sub-network using a fusion module to create a more meaningful feature map. The fused feature map is passed into the fused classifier for overall classification. Unlike existing feature fusion methods, in our framework, an ensemble of sub-network classifiers transfers its knowledge to the fused classifier and then the fused classifier delivers its knowledge back to each subnetwork, mutually teaching one another in an online-knowledge distillation manner. This mutually teaching system not only improves the performance of the fused classifier but also obtains performance gain in each sub-network. Moreover, our model is more beneficial than other alternative methods because different types of network can be used for each sub-network. We have performed a variety of experiments on multiple datasets such as CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet and proved that our method is more effective than other alternative methods in terms of performances of both sub-networks and the fused classifier, and the aspect of generating meaningful feature maps. The code is available at this link1.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412615

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. kim, 0, Paraphrasing complex network: Network compression via factor transfer, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2765
  2. romero, 2014, Fitnets Hints for thin deep nets
  3. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.754 · DOI
  4. furlanello, 2018, Born Again Neural Networks
  5. kim, 0, Qkd Quantization-aware knowledge distillation
  6. chung, 2020, Feature-map-level online adversarial knowledge distillation
  7. han, 2015, Deep compression Compressing deep neural networks with pruning trained quantization and huffman coding
  8. kim, 2020, Position-based scaled gradient for model quantization and sparse training
  9. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00454 · DOI
  10. lan, 0, Knowledge distillation by on-the-fly native ensemble, Advances in neural information processing systems
  11. johnson, 0, Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution, European Conference on Computer Vision, 694
  12. chen, 2017, Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation
  13. goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
  14. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00225 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TITS.2017.2775628 · DOI
  16. hinton, 2015, Distilling the knowledge in a neural network
  17. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.62 · DOI
  18. zagoruyko, 2016, Paying more attention to attention Improving the performance of convolutional neural networks via attention transfer
  19. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.170 · DOI
  20. krizhevsky, 2009, Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images
  21. howard, 2017, Mobilenets Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications
  22. srivastava, 0, Training very deep networks, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2377
  23. 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.74 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J., Hyun, M., Chung, I., & Kwak, N.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-01-10
Pages
4619-4625
ISSN
1041-3278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3161758233
Cited by
106
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25
FWCI
7.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
IITP (2019-0-01367)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
feature fusion, online knowledge distillation, feature map fusion, classifier combination, parallel neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review