The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT*
Open accessAbstract
The Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm, based on incremental sampling, efficiently computes motion plans. Although the RRT algorithm quickly produces candidate feasible solutions, it tends to converge to a solution that is far from optimal. Practical applications favor "anytime" algorithms that quickly identify an initial feasible plan, then, given more computation time available during plan execution, improve the plan toward an optimal solution. This paper describes an anytime algorithm based on the RRT* which (like the RRT) finds an initial feasible solution quickly, but (unlike the RRT) almost surely converges to an optimal solution. We present two key extensions to the RRT% committed trajectories and branch-and-bound tree adaptation, that together enable the algorithm to make more efficient use of computation time online, resulting in an anytime algorithm for real-time implementation. We evaluate the method using a series of Monte Carlo runs in a high-fidelity simulation environment, and compare the operation of the RRT and RRT* methods. We also demonstrate experimental results for an outdoor wheeled robotic vehicle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces
Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.508439 · Cited by 6,343
Cited by
A Review of Motion Planning Techniques for Automated Vehicles
Gonzalez, D., Perez, J., Milanes, V., & Nashashibi, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2498841 · Cited by 1,670
Gammell, J. D., Srinivasa, S. S., & Barfoot, T. D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942976 · Cited by 1,207
Heuristic approaches in robot path planning: A survey
Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Tran, D. T., & De Keyser, R. (2016) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.001 · Cited by 641
Autonomous driving system: A comprehensive survey
Zhao, J., Zhao, W., Deng, B., Wang, Z., Zhang, F., Zheng, W., Cao, W., Nan, J., Lian, Y., & Burke, A. F. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122836 · Cited by 361
Potential information fields for mobile robot exploration
Vallvé, J., & Andrade-Cetto, J. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.009 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Karaman, S., Walter, M. R., Perez, A., Frazzoli, E., & Teller, S.
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-05
- Pages
- 1478-1483
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112271657
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icra.2011.5980479
- The paper
- Karaman, S., Walter, M. R., Perez, A., Frazzoli, E., & Teller, S. (2011). Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT*. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2011.5980479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.