Fast LIDAR localization using multiresolution Gaussian mixture maps
Abstract
This paper reports on a fast multiresolution scan matcher for vehicle localization in urban environments for self-driving cars. State-of-the-art approaches to vehicle localization rely on observing road surface reflectivity with a three-dimensional (3D) light detection and ranging (LIDAR) scanner to achieve centimeter-level accuracy. However, these approaches can often fail when faced with adverse weather conditions that obscure the view of the road paint (e.g., puddles and snowdrifts) or poor road surface texture. We propose a new scan matching algorithm that leverages Gaussian mixture maps to exploit the structure in the environment; these maps are a collection of Gaussian mixtures over the z-height distribution. We achieve real-time performance by developing a novel branch-and-bound, multiresolution approach that makes use of rasterized lookup tables of these Gaussian mixtures. Results are shown on two datasets that are 3.0 km: a standard trajectory and another under adverse weather conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NDT proved to be more robust than point-to-point ICP matching.
“NDT proved to be more robust than pointto-point ICP matching.”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i> (2020) · cites this paper as [120]
Cites
FAB-MAP: Probabilistic Localization and Mapping in the Space of Appearance
Cummins, M., & Newman, P. (2008) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364908090961 · Cited by 1,472 · see citing works
Map-Based Precision Vehicle Localization in Urban Environments
Levinson, J., Montemerlo, M., & Thrun, S. (2007) · Robotics: Science and Systems III · doi:10.15607/rss.2007.iii.016 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Visual localization within LIDAR maps for automated urban driving
Wolcott, R. W., & Eustice, R. M. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942558 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: <i>Common Practices and Emerging Technologies</i>
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
Autonomous Vehicle Navigation in Rural Environments Without Detailed Prior Maps
Ort, T., Paull, L., & Rus, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460519 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wolcott, R. W., & Eustice, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Eustice, Ryan M.
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-05
- Pages
- 2814-2821
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1479814506
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 26.21
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Keywords
- vehicle localization, branch and bound, autonomous vehicles, urban environment, adverse weather, real-time localization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review