Cited by 29Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A fast, modular scene understanding system using context-aware object detection

Cadena, Cesar, Dick, Anthony, Reid, Ian D.·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

We propose a semantic scene understanding system that is suitable for real robotic operations. The system solves different tasks (semantic segmentation and object detections) in an opportunistic and distributed fashion but still allows communication between modules to improve their respective performances. We propose the use of the semantic space to improve specific out-of-the-box object detectors and an update model to take the evidence from different detection into account in the semantic segmentation process. Our proposal is evaluated with the KITTI dataset, on the object detection benchmark and on five different sequences manually annotated for the semantic segmentation task, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2015.7139874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. yao, 2012, Describing the scene as a whole: Joint object detection, scene classification and semantic segmentation, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 702
  2. 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459249 · DOI
  3. wu, 2014, Hierarchical semantic labeling for task-relevant rgb-d perception, Robotics Science and Systems (RSS), 10.15607/RSS.2014.X.006 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248074 · DOI · Paper page
  5. geiger, 2011, Joint 3d estimation of objects and scene layout, Advances in neural information processing systems
  6. heitz, 2009, Cascaded classification models: Combining models for holistic scene understanding, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21, 641
  7. heitz, 2008, Learning spatial context: Using stuff to find things, Computer Vision ECCV 2008, 30, 10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_4 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/ICCV.2005.107 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s11263-008-0137-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1063/1.1689000 · DOI
  11. kwitt, 2012, Scene recognition on the semantic manifold, Computer Vision-ECCV 2012, 359, 10.1007/978-3-642-33765-9_26 · DOI
  12. ladický, 2010, What, Where and How Many? Combining Object Detectors and CRFs, 10.1007/978-3-642-15561-1_31 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/CVPR.2013.405 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/1961189.1961199 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630632 · DOI
  16. cadena, 2013, Recursive Inference for Prediction of Objects in Urban Environments, International Symposium on Robotics Research
  17. 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2300479 · DOI
  18. wojek, 2008, A dynamic conditional random field model for joint labeling of object and scene classes, Computer Vision ECCV 2008, 733, 10.1007/978-3-540-88693-8_54 · DOI
  19. dollár, 0, Piotr's Image and Video Matlab Toolbox (PMT)
  20. 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.231 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907237 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.167 · DOI · Paper page
  23. berger, 1985, Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, 10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. li, 2010, Towards holistic scene understanding: Feedback enabled cascaded classification models, Advances in neural information processing systems, 23, 1351
  25. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.119 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/0278364912437903 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587372 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s11263-011-0514-3 · DOI
  29. scharwächter, 2014, Stixmantics: A medium-level model for real-time semantic scene understanding, Computer Vision-ECCV 2014, 533, 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_35 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/CVPR.2013.396 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cadena, C., Dick, A., & Reid, I. D.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-05
Pages
4859-4866
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1593286969
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
scene understanding, semantic segmentation, modular robots, distributed computing, semantic space, evidence combination, multi-target detection, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review