Cited by 1,533Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning

Open access
Zhu, Yuke, Mottaghi, Roozbeh, Kolve, Eric, Lim, Joseph J., Gupta, Abhinav, Fei-Fei, Li, Farhadi, Ali·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Two less addressed issues of deep reinforcement learning are (1) lack of generalization capability to new goals, and (2) data inefficiency, i.e., the model requires several (and often costly) episodes of trial and error to converge, which makes it impractical to be applied to real-world scenarios. In this paper, we address these two issues and apply our model to target-driven visual navigation. To address the first issue, we propose an actor-critic model whose policy is a function of the goal as well as the current state, which allows better generalization. To address the second issue, we propose the AI2-THOR framework, which provides an environment with high-quality 3D scenes and a physics engine. Our framework enables agents to take actions and interact with objects. Hence, we can collect a huge number of training samples efficiently. We show that our proposed method (1) converges faster than the state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning methods, (2) generalizes across targets and scenes, (3) generalizes to a real robot scenario with a small amount of fine-tuning (although the model is trained in simulation), (4) is end-to-end trainable and does not need feature engineering, feature matching between frames or 3D reconstruction of the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2017.7989381

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instruction-following navigation relies on R2R and REVERIE tasks, enhancing natural language interaction and environment-specific reasoning, and highlighting multimodal perception in complex scenarios.

    “Instructionfollowing Navigation relies on the development of Room-to-Room (R2R) and REVERIE tasks, which enhances natural language interaction and environment-specific reasoning, and further highlights the role of multimodal perception in complex scenarios [111,31,112,113].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 1,533

Authors
Zhu, Y., Mottaghi, R., Kolve, E., Lim, J. J., Gupta, A., Fei-Fei, L., & Farhadi, A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-05
Pages
3357-3364
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962887844
Cited by
1,533
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 233 · 2019: 223 · 2018: 141 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 1
FWCI
79.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
indoor navigation, deep reinforcement learning, goal-conditioned policies, actor-critic, data efficiency, AI2-THOR, 3D simulation environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review