The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active vision
Open accessAbstract
We address one of the main challenges towards autonomous quadrotor flight in complex environments, which is flight through narrow gaps. While previous works relied on off-board localization systems or on accurate prior knowledge of the gap position and orientation in the world reference frame, we rely solely on onboard sensing and computing and estimate the full state by fusing gap detection from a single onboard camera with an IMU. This problem is challenging for two reasons: (i) the quadrotor pose uncertainty with respect to the gap increases quadratically with the distance from the gap; (ii) the quadrotor has to actively control its orientation towards the gap to enable state estimation (i.e., active vision). We solve this problem by generating a trajectory that considers geometric, dynamic, and perception constraints: during the approach maneuver, the quadrotor always faces the gap to allow state estimation, while respecting the vehicle dynamics; during the traverse through the gap, the distance of the quadrotor to the edges of the gap is maximized. Furthermore, we replan the trajectory during its execution to cope with the varying uncertainty of the state estimate. We successfully evaluate and demonstrate the proposed approach in many real experiments, achieving a success rate of 80% and gap orientations up to 45°. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that addresses and achieves autonomous, aggressive flight through narrow gaps using only onboard sensing and computing and without prior knowledge of the pose of the gap.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REMODE: Probabilistic, monocular dense reconstruction in real time
Pizzoli, M., Forster, C., & Scaramuzza, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907233 · Cited by 330 · cited 2×
“A valid alternative to cope with real-world gaps would be to use monocular densereconstruction methods, such as REMODE [13]; however, they require more computing power (GPUs).”
MethodSelf-citation
Cited by
The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics
Delmerico, J., Mintchev, S., Giusti, A., Gromov, B., Melo, K., Horvat, T., Cadena, C., Hutter, M., Ijspeert, A., Floreano, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21887 · Cited by 371
Self-citationFundamental Actuation Properties of Multirotors: Force–Moment Decoupling and Fail–Safe Robustness
Michieletto, G., Ryll, M., & Franchi, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2821155 · Cited by 107
Collaborative Multi-Robot Systems for Search and Rescue: Coordination and Perception
Queralta, J. P., Taipalmaa, J., Pullinen, B. C., Sarker, V. K., Gia, T. N., Tenhunen, H., Gabbouj, M., Raitoharju, J., & Westerlund, T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.12610 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Falanga, D., Mueggler, E., Faessler, M., & Scaramuzza, D.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-05
- Pages
- 5774-5781
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2614122538
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icra.2017.7989679
- The paper
- Falanga, D., Mueggler, E., Faessler, M., & Scaramuzza, D. (2017). Aggressive quadrotor flight through narrow gaps with onboard sensing and computing using active vision. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2017.7989679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.