The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Using Variable Natural Environment Brain-Computer Interface Stimuli for Real-time Humanoid Robot Navigation
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses the challenge of humanoid robot teleoperation in a natural indoor environment via a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). We leverage deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based image and signal understanding to facilitate both real-time object detection and dry-Electroencephalography (EEG) based human cortical brain bio-signals decoding. We employ recent advances in dry-EEG technology to stream and collect the cortical waveforms from subjects while they fixate on variable Steady State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP) stimuli generated directly from the environment the robot is navigating. To these ends, we propose the use of novel variable BCI stimuli by utilising the real-time video streamed via the on-board robot camera as visual input for SSVEP, where the CNN detected natural scene objects are altered and flickered with differing frequencies (10Hz, 12Hz and 15Hz). These stimuli are not akin to traditional stimuli - as both the dimensions of the flicker regions and their on-screen position changes depending on the scene objects detected. Onscreen object selection via such a dry-EEG enabled SSVEP methodology, facilitates the on-line decoding of human cortical brain signals, via a specialised secondary CNN, directly into teleoperation robot commands (approach object, move in a specific direction: right, left or back). This SSVEP decoding model is trained via a priori offline experimental data in which very similar visual input is present for all subjects. The resulting classification demonstrates high performance with mean accuracy of 85% for the real-time robot navigation experiment across multiple test subjects.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results show that the DA method significantly improves the accuracy in real-time navigation tasks across multiple subjects.”
From Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Aznan et al., 2019
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 30
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1109/TCDS.2016.2541162 · DOI
- 10.1109/CCDC.2018.8408005 · DOI
- 10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966228 · DOI
- naz, 2016, Recent Trends in BCI based Speller System: A Survey Report, International Journal of Engineering Science, 6
- 10.1186/s12868-015-0234-7 · DOI
- 10.1155/2017/1742862 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40815-016-0289-3 · DOI
- aznan, 2018, On the Classification of SSVEP-Based Dry-EEG Signals via Convolutional Neural Networks, IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 3716
- goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
- 10.1155/2017/8316485 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989260 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00182 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bspc.2016.09.005 · DOI
- 10.3390/s140712847 · DOI
- 10.1109/TBME.2015.2481482 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139032803 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487227 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2219046 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2597863 · DOI
- lin, 2014, Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context, European Conference on Computer Vision, 740
- liu, 2016, SSD: Single Shot Multibox Detector, European Conference on Computer Vision, 21
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 · DOI
- kundegorski, 2014, A Photogrammetric Approach for Real-time 3D Localization and Tracking of Pedestrians in Monocular Infrared Imagery, Optics and Photonics for Counterterrorism Crime Fighting and Defence X and Optical Materials and Biomaterials in Security and Defence Systems Technology XI, 9253, 92530i
- kingma, 2014, Adam: A method for Stochastic Optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv 1412 6980
Metadata
- Authors
- Aznan, N. K. N., Connolly, J. D., Moubayed, N. A., & Breckon, T. P.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Venue
- 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-05
- Pages
- 4889-4895
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900742222
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, steady-state visual evoked potentials, real-time object detection, robot navigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review