Cited by 57Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

RLAfford: End-to-End Affordance Learning for Robotic Manipulation

Geng, Yiran, An, Boshi, Geng, Haoran, Chen, Yuanpei, Yang, Yaodong, Dong, Hao·2023·2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Learning to manipulate 3D objects in an interactive environment has been a challenging problem in Reinforcement Learning (RL). In particular, it is hard to train a policy that can generalize over objects with different semantic categories, diverse shape geometry and versatile functionality. In this study, we focused on the contact information in manipulation processes, and proposed a unified representation for critical interactions to describe different kinds of manipulation tasks. Specifically, we take advantage of the contact information generated during the RL training process and employ it as unified visual representation to predict contact map of interest. Such representation leads to an end-to-end learning framework that combined affordance based and RL based methods for the first time. Our unified framework can generalize over different types of manipulation tasks. Surprisingly, the effectiveness of such framework holds even under the multi-stage and multi-agent scenarios. We tested our method on eight types of manipulation tasks. Results showed that our methods outperform baseline algorithms, including visual affordance methods and RL methods, by a large margin on the success rate. The demonstration can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/rlafford/.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161571

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Point-level affordance provides actionable priors for downstream manipulation tasks.

    “Recent studies have shown that point-level affordance provides actionable priors for downstream manipulation tasks.”
  • Existing works for manipulating articulated objects primarily focus on single-object scenarios with homogeneous agents, neglecting the realistic constraints imposed by the environment and the agent's morphology.

    “However, existing works primarily focus on single-object scenarios with homogeneous agents, overlooking the realistic constraints imposed by the environment and the agent's morphology, e.g. , occlusions and physical limitations.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 57

Authors
Geng, Y., An, B., Geng, H., Chen, Y., Yang, Y., & Dong, H.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-05-29
Pages
5880-5886
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383108731
Cited by
57
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 5
FWCI
24.40
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62136001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
affordance learning, robotic manipulation, contact information, contact map prediction, end-to-end learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review