Ethical Considerations in the Use of AI for Higher Education: A Comprehensive Guide
Abstract
Conversational AI refers to the use of artificial intelligence technology to enable machines to engage in human-like conversations, allowing for interactive and dynamic interactions with users. There are several tools that are developed by using AI and are widely used across various domains. In education, AI tools can offer several benefits, such as increased accessibility, personalized learning experiences, and improved engagement for students. However, potential downsides may include concerns about data privacy, accuracy of responses, and overreliance on technology without human interaction for holistic learning. This research paper aims to provide a comprehensive guide on the ethical aspects of using AI in higher education. Drawing on insights from twenty recent research papers in the field, this paper discusses the right direction and attitude towards AI, the potential benefits for students, and the risks of electronic plagiarism, black box theory, and diminished creativity. The paper also examines whether AI should be prohibited in higher education to mitigate the potential negative effects. This paper contributes to the ongoing conversation on the role of AI in education and provides a foundation for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Promoting ethical GenAI use through proven frameworks and educational strategies may prevent issues like plagiarism and bias.
“Likewise, promoting ethical GenAI use through proven frameworks and educational strategies may prevent issues like plagiarism and bias [17].”
From Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Li, Z., Dhruv, A., & Jain, V.
- Affiliations
- Thompson Rivers University (CA)
- Venue
- 2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-02-05
- Pages
- 218-223
- OpenAlex
- W4393066486
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, higher education, AI ethics, conversational AI, black box problem, creativity, data privacy, personalized learning, student engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review