A Secured Patient’s Online Data Monitoring through Blockchain: An Intelligent way to Store Lifetime Medical Records
Abstract
The most reliable all-together cryptosystem is Blockchain technology that gives a framework for safe transactions across networks expect to its immutability and unchanging features. Blockchain technology has attracted the attention of various startups, developers, and administrators as a decentralized infrastructure. This system protects all supplies from fraud and provides a tracking tool to track all previous network activities. The Online Medical Record (OMR) system allows patients to share information and control the health status of specific people. Unable to grant emergency personnel access to patient OMR in case of any emergency. In addition, the patient needs a history record management system of OMR, which displays a large amount of personal data. This paper proposes a framework for medical healthcare record management that engages Blockchain network to provide a defensive protection system and consider secure policies. These components involved the detection, protection, and monitoring of extensible access control in an urgent condition. The suggested model supports higher efficiency than related refined healthcare systems related to privacy, accessibility, data auditing in trials, and access control in an emergency situation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complexities of COVID-19 coupled with scarce resources and rising healthcare cost has encouraged many to access remote health management services using computer or similar devices.
“The complexities of COVID-19 coupled with scarce resources and rising healthcare cost has encouraged many to access remote health management services using computer or similar devices [137–140].”
From Federated learning-based AI approaches in smart healthcare: Concepts, taxonomies, challenges and open issues (2023) · cites this paper as [139]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Hossain, M. J., Wadud, M. A. H., Rahman, A., Ferdous, J., Alam, M. S., Amir - Ul - Haque Bhuiyan, T. M., & Mridha, M. F.
- Affiliations
- Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University (BD)
- Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University,Department of Computer Science and Engineering
- Venue
- 2021 International Conference on Science & Contemporary Technologies (ICSCT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-08-05
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W4206164128
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Science & Contemporary Technologies (ICSCT) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- blockchain, electronic health records, patient data security, medical records management, access control, emergency access, data privacy, data auditing, decentralized storage, health data monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review