The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experiments on the effectiveness of dataflow- and control-flow-based test adequacy criteria
Abstract
This paper reports an experimental study investigating the effectiveness of two code-based test adequacy criteria for identifying sets of test cases that detect faults. The all-edges and all-DUs (modified all-uses) coverage criteria were applied to 130 faulty program versions derived from seven moderate size base programs by seeding realistic faults. We generated several thousand test sets for each faulty program and examined the relationship between fault detection and coverage. Within the limited domain of our experiments, test sets achieving coverage levels over 90% usually showed significantly better fault detection than randomly chosen test sets of the same size. In addition, significant improvements in the effectiveness of coverage-based tests usually occurred as coverage increased from 90% to 100%. However the results also indicate that 100% code coverage alone is not a reliable indicator of the effectiveness of a test set. We also found that tests based respectively on control-flow and dataflow criteria are frequency complementary in their effectiveness.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The ManyBugs and IntroClass benchmarks for automated repair of C programs
Le Goues, C., Holtschulte, N., Smith, E. K., Brun, Y., Devanbu, P., Forrest, S., & Weimer, W. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2015.2454513 · Cited by 326
Using entropy measures for comparison of software traces
Miranskyy, A. V., Davison, M., Reesor, R. M., & Murtaza, S. S. (2012) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2012.03.017 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchins, M., Foster, H., Goradia, T., & Ostrand, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc. Press
- Published
- 2002-12-17
- Pages
- 191-200
- OpenAlex
- W4236200536
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiments on the effectiveness of dataflow- and control-flow-based test adequacy criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icse.1994.296778
- The paper
- Hutchins, M., Foster, H., Goradia, T., & Ostrand, T. (2002). Experiments on the effectiveness of dataflow- and control-flow-based test adequacy criteria. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.1994.296778
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
