Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,430

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Documenting software architectures: views and beyond

Clements, P., Garlan, D., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.·2003·25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.
DOI 10.1109/icse.2003.1201264
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This lecture maps the concepts and templates explored in this tutorial with well-known architectural prescriptions, including the 4+1 approach of the Rational Unified Process, the Siemens Four Views approach, and the ANSI/IEEE-1471-2000 recommended best practice for documenting architectures for software-intensive systems. The lecture concludes by re-capping the highlights of the tutorial, and asking for feedback.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icse.2003.1201264

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,430

Metadata

Authors
Clements, P., Garlan, D., Little, R., Nord, R., & Stafford, J.
Venue
25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings.
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2003
Pages
740-741
ISSN
0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/icse.2003.1201264
OpenAlex
W2038476425
Cited by
1,430
References
0
FWCI
62.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Documenting software architectures: views and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icse.2003.1201264
The paper
Clements, P., Garlan, D., Little, R., Nord, R., & Stafford, J. (2003). Documenting software architectures: views and beyond. 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2003.1201264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.