Cited by 75Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSecurity and Verification in ComputingAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques

DeepPayload: Black-box Backdoor Attack on Deep Learning Models through Neural Payload Injection

Open access
Li, Yuanchun, Hua, Jiayi, Wang, Haoyu, Chen, Chunyang, Liu, Yunxin·2021·2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)

Abstract

Deep learning models are increasingly used in mobile applications as critical components. Unlike the program bytecode whose vulnerabilities and threats have been widely-discussed, whether and how the deep learning models deployed in the applications can be compromised are not well-understood since Neural Networks are usually viewed as a black box. In this paper, we introduce a highly practical backdoor attack achieved with a set of reverse-engineering techniques over compiled deep learning models. The core of the attack is a neural conditional branch constructed with a trigger detector and several operators and injected into the victim model as a malicious payload. The attack is effective as the conditional logic can be flexibly customized by the attacker, and scalable as it does not require any prior knowledge from the original model. We evaluated the attack effectiveness using 5 state-of-the-art deep learning models and real-world samples collected from 30 users. The results demonstrated that the injected backdoor can be triggered with a success rate of 93.5%, while only brought less than 2ms latency overhead and no more than 1.4% accuracy decrease. We further conducted an empirical study on real-world mobile deep learning apps collected from Google Play. We found 54 apps that were vulnerable to our attack, including popular and security-critical ones. The results call for the awareness of deep learning application developers and auditors to enhance the protection of deployed models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icse43902.2021.00035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 75

Authors
Li, Y., Hua, J., Wang, H., Chen, C., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Monash University (AU)
Venue
2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-05
Pages
263-274
ISSN
0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163168187
Cited by
75
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
Keywords
backdoor attacks, black-box attacks, deep learning model security, trigger detection, model obfuscation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review