Using Piezoelectric Elements as Footsteps Energy Harvester: an Investigation
Abstract
This paper presents the result of a preliminary investigation to evaluate the possibility of using piezoelectric element to harvest energy from footsteps. A prototype piezoelectric floor tile was built to study the amount of energy that could be harvested. Using this prototype, the energy harvested was recorded and discussed. After the energy had been harvested, methods to store the energy were looked into. Two experiments were conducted to investigate harvesting performance. In the first experiment, connection between each piezoelectric element was varied and in the second experiment the distance between each column of piezoelectric element was varied. Rechargeable batteries were used as storage, where the energy harvested from the piezoelectric array will charge the battery. By conducting these experiments, it was found that the prototype floor mat produced the highest current of 48.5μA, when the piezoelectric array was connected in parallel, with a distance that matches the average foot size.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting tiles: Available designs and future perspective
Sharma, S., Kiran, R., Azad, P., & Vaish, R. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115272 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Evaluation of harvesting energy from pedestrians using piezoelectric floor tile energy harvester
Yingyong, P., Thainiramit, P., Jayasvasti, S., Thanach-Issarasak, N., & Isarakorn, D. (2021) · Sensors and Actuators A: Physical · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2021.113035 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Piezoelectric Sensors Pressed by Human Footsteps for Energy Harvesting
Selim, K. K., Smaili, I. H., Yehia, H. M., Ahmed, M. M. R., & Saleeb, D. A. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17102297 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
PIEZOELECTRIC ENERGY HARVESTING USING FOOTSTEPS
Withana, A., Samarakoon, S., Amarasuriya, H., Peiris, B., & Lucas, R. (2023) · Journal of Advances in Engineering · doi:10.64701/joae/345/8722
- Authors
- Kamal, P. N. M., & Buniyamin, N.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY)
- ORCID
- Buniyamin, Norlida
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE 8th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-10
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2908899189
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Nuclear Energy and Engineering › Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations
- Keywords
- piezoelectric energy harvesting, footsteps, piezoelectric arrays, parallel connection, battery charging, energy storage, rechargeable batteries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review