Cited by 234Hydrological Forecasting Using AINeural Networks and ApplicationsData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

A rainfall prediction model using artificial neural network

Abhishek, Kumar, Kumar, Abhay, Ranjan, Rajeev, Kumar, Sarthak·2012·2012 IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium

Abstract

The multilayered artificial neural network with learning by back-propagation algorithm configuration is the most common in use, due to of its ease in training. It is estimated that over 80% of all the neural network projects in development use back-propagation. In back-propagation algorithm, there are two phases in its learning cycle, one to propagate the input patterns through the network and other to adapt the output by changing the weights in the network. The back-propagation-feed forward neural network can be used in many applications such as character recognition, weather and financial prediction, face detection etc. The paper implements one of these applications by building training and testing data sets and finding the number of hidden neurons in these layers for the best performance. In the present research, possibility of predicting average rainfall over Udupi district of Karnataka has been analyzed through artificial neural network models. In formulating artificial neural network based predictive models three layered network has been constructed. The models under study are different in the number of hidden neurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsgrc.2012.6287140

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two machine learning techniques (SVM and CNN) were developed to extract human settlements from Very High Resolution satellite images of 3 provinces in Afghanistan.

    “In [162], two ML techniques (SVM and CNN) were developed to extract human settlements from Very High Resolution (VHR) satellite images of 3 provinces in Afghanistan.”
  • By comparing with analyst-verified reference data, the CNN technique yielded more accurate results overall in terms of overall pixel cells, while SVM performed more accurately in omission based on derived statistics.

    “By comparing the results with analyst-verified reference data information (LandScan Settlement Layer), the authors demonstrated that in terms of overall pixel cells the CNN technique yielded more accurate results overall while based on derived statistics against the reference data the SVM technique performed more accurately in omission.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abhishek, K., Kumar, A., Ranjan, R., & Kumar, S.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Patna (IN)
  • Deolitte India, Pune, India
Venue
2012 IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-07
Pages
82-87
OpenAlex
W2094978308
Cited by
234
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7
FWCI
46.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
precipitation forecasting, artificial neural networks, backpropagation, feedforward neural networks, Udupi district, weather forecasting, training and testing datasets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review