The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the benefits of incorporating function clone detection in a development process
Abstract
The aim of the experiment presented in this paper is to present an insight into the evaluation of the potential benefits of introducing a function clone detection technology in an industrial software development process. To take advantage of function clone detection, two modifications to the software development process are presented. Our experiment consists of evaluating the impact that these proposed changes would have had on a specific software system if they had been applied over a 3 year period (involving 10000 person-months), where 6 subsequent versions of the software under study were released. The software under study is a large telecommunication system. In total 89 million lines of code have been analyzed. A first result showed that, against our expectations, a significant number of clones are being removed from the system over time. However, this effort is insufficient to prevent the growth of the overall number of clones in the system. In this context the first process change would have added value. We have also found that the second process change would have provided programmers with a significant number of opportunities for correcting problems before customers experienced them. This result shows a potential for improving the software system quality and customer satisfaction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clone detection using abstract syntax trees
Baxter, I. D., Yahin, A., Moura, L., Sant'Anna, M., & Bier, L. (2002) · Proceedings. International Conference on Software Maintenance (Cat. No. 98CB36272) · doi:10.1109/icsm.1998.738528 · Cited by 1,277
DECKARD: Scalable and Accurate Tree-Based Detection of Code Clones
Jiang, L., Misherghi, G., Su, Z., & Glondu, S. (2007) · 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07) · doi:10.1109/icse.2007.30 · Cited by 1,039
Finding Clones with Dup: Analysis of an Experiment
Baker, B. S. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.70720 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Lague, B., Proulx, D., Mayrand, J., Merlo, E. M., & Hudepohl, J.
- Venue
- 1997 Proceedings International Conference on Software Maintenance
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 314-321
- OpenAlex
- W2115534035
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
