The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Graphical interfaces for cooperative planning systems
Open accessAbstract
Enroute flight planning (selecting alternate routes or destinations due to unanticipated weather, traffic, malfunctions, etc.) is being used as the context for studying the design of cooperative problem-solving systems. A testbed, Flight Planner, for studying computer aids for enroute flight path planning, is described. Its design is based on a cognitive task analysis of five airline flight crews in a simulator study. The testbed runs on a Macintosh II controlling three color monitors, and is being used to study the design of supports for both flight crews and dispatchers. Some of the design concepts being studied in this environment are discussed.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interfaces based on ideas very similar to those proposed here have been built for the domain of information retrieval in libraries and are currently being built for the domain of aviation.
“Interfaces based on ideas very similar to those proposed here have been built for the domain of information retrieval in libraries [34, 70, 71, 72] and are currently being built for the domain of aviation [52].”
From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- woods, 0, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 3
- 10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0004-3702(74)90026-5 · DOI
- 1986, User Centered System Design
- 10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80004-8 · DOI
- wilensky, 1983, Planning and Understanding A Computational Approach to Human Reasoning
- 10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80012-3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations
Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.156574 · Cited by 1,084
Metadata
- Authors
- Layton, C. F., Smith, P. J., & McCoy, C. E.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- San Jose State University (US)
- ORCID
- Smith, P.J.
- Venue
- 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002-12-04
- Pages
- 508-511
- ISSN
- 1062-922X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118857864
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- graphical user interface, collaborative problem solving, cognitive task analysis, aircrew, computer-aided decision support, airline operations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
