Use of machine learning for classification of magnetocardiograms
Abstract
We describe the use of machine learning for pattern recognition in magnetocardiography (MCG) that measures magnetic fields emitted by the electrophysiological activity of the heart. We used direct kernel methods to separate abnormal MCG heart patterns from normal ones. For unsupervised learning, we introduced Direct Kernel based Self-Organizing Maps. For supervised learning we used Direct Kernel Partial Least Squares and (Direct) Kernel Ridge Regression. These results are then compared with classical Support Vector Machines and Kernel Partial Least Squares. The hyperparameters for these methods were tuned on a validation subset of the training data before testing. We also investigated the most effective pre-processing, using local, vertical, horizontal and two-dimensional (global) Mahanalobis scaling, wavelet transforms and experimented with variable selection by filtering. The results, similar for all three methods, were encouraging, exceeding the quality of classification achieved by the trained experts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine learning is a suitable tool to automatically and reliably classify certain diseases from magnetocardiograms.
“It could be shown that ML is a suitable tool to automatically and reliably classify certain diseases from magnetocardiograms [33,34].”
From Biomagnetism using SQUIDs: status and perspectives (2006) · cites this paper as [34]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 56 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Embrechts, M., Szymanski, B., Sternickel, K., Naenna, T., & Bragaspathi, R.
- Affiliations
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Schenectady County Historical Society (US)
- ORCID
- Szymanski, B.
- Venue
- SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-04-23
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 1400-1405
- ISSN
- 1062-922X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165571897
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 17.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- magnetocardiography, heart disease detection, kernel methods, kernel partial least squares, kernel ridge regression, support vector machine, wavelet transform, feature selection, pattern recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review