CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 163Human-Automation Interaction and SafetySocial Robot Interaction and HRITeleoperation and Haptic Systems

"Where am i?" acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform

Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.·2005·2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583)
DOI 10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400762
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Human-robot interaction with urban search and rescue (USAR) robots needs to provide operators with a means of maintaining situation awareness (SA), especially since the USAR operators usually cannot see the robots that they are directing. We used a technique from human-computer interaction known as usability testing, plus implicit and explicit SA measurement techniques, to investigate USAR operators' levels of SA and strategies for maintaining SA. We found that operators developed different SA strategies, spent an average of 30% of their time solely in SA activities, had less SA of the space behind the robot than in front or on the sides, did not use automatically-generated maps to gain SA, and had difficulty maintaining SA when in the autonomous mode.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400762

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yanco, H. A., & Drury, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
  • Mitre (United States) (US)
ORCID
Venue
2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-03-31
Volume
3
Pages
2835-2840
ISSN
1062-922X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400762
OpenAlex
W2124765345
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Massachusetts
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
situational awareness, human-robot interaction, telerobotics, operator workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review