The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bernoulli's principle of insufficient reason and conservation of information in computer search
Abstract
Conservation of information (COI) popularized by the no free lunch theorem is a great leveler of search algorithms, showing that on average no search outperforms any other. Yet in practice some searches appear to outperform others. In consequence, some have questioned the significance of COI to the performance of search algorithms. An underlying foundation of COI is Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason(PrOIR) which imposes of a uniform distribution on a search space in the absence of all prior knowledge about the search target or the search space structure. The assumption is conserved under mapping. If the probability of finding a target in a search space is p, then the problem of finding the target in any subset of the search space is p. More generally, all some-to-many mappings of a uniform search space result in a new search space where the chance of doing better than p is 50-50. Consequently the chance of doing worse is 50-50. This result can be viewed as a confirming property of COI. To properly assess the significance of the COI for search, one must completely identify the precise sources of information that affect search performance. This discussion leads to resolution of the seeming conflict between COI and the observation that some search algorithms perform well on a large class of problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Normalization imposes limitations to Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason (PrOIR).
“Normalization imposes limitations to Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason (PrOIR), otherwise known as the Principle of Indifference [17-19].”
From Is cosmological tuning fine or coarse? (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I
Gödel, K. (1931) · Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01700692 · Cited by 2,395
Schaffer, C. (1993) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022653209073 · Cited by 310
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1016/0167-7152(94)00090-U · DOI
- han, 2002, Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for a class of combinatorial optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 580, 10.1109/TEVC.2002.804320 · DOI
- ho, 2002, Simple explanation of the no-free-lunch theorem, J Optimiz Theory Appl, 115, 549570, 10.1023/A:1021251113462 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICEC.1997.592270 · DOI
- ho, 2001, Simple explanantion of the No Free Lunch Theorem, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
- jones, 1997, Computability and Complexity From a Programming Perspective, 10.7551/mitpress/2003.001.0001 · DOI
- kasner, 2001, Mathematics and the Imagination
- 10.1017/CBO9780511498480 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAC.2003.811254 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1 · DOI · Paper page
- wolpert, 1992, On the connection between in-sample testing and generalization error, Complex Systems, 6, 47
- 10.1109/TEVC.2005.856205 · DOI
- 10.1109/4235.585893 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5345941 · DOI
- fisher, 1922, Mathematical Theory Of Probabilities & Its Applications To Frequency Curves & Statistical Methods
- fogel, 1998, Evolutionary Computation The Fossil Record, 10.1109/9780470544600 · DOI
- fogel, 2001, Blondie24 Playing at the Edge of AI
- 10.1109/JPROC.2004.837633 · DOI
- fogel, 2005, Evolutionary Computation Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence, 10.1002/0471749214 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511609220 · DOI
- bertrand, 1896, Calcul des Probabilite?s
- bernoulli, 1713, Ars Conjectandi (The Art of Conjecturing)
- atlas, 1992, A performance comparison of trained multi-layer perceptrons and classification trees, Neural Networks Theoretical Foundations and Analysis, 284
- christensen, 2001, What can we learn from No Free Lunch? A First Attempt to Characterize the Concept of a Searchable, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
- go?del, 1932, Zum intuitionistischen Aussagenkalku?l, Anzeiger, 69, 6566
- chaitin, 1999, The Unknowable
- chaitin, 1997, The Limits of Mathematics
- ha?ggstro?m, 2007, Biology and Philosophy, 22, 217, 10.1007/s10539-006-9040-z · DOI
- 10.1109/TASSP.1984.1164357 · DOI
- zurada, 1994, Computational Intelligence Imitating Life
- corne, 2003, No Free Lunch and Free Leftovers Theorems for Multiobjective Optimisation Problems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10.1007/3-540-36970-8_23 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511535499 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00993504 · DOI · Paper page
- schaffer, 1992, Sparse Data and the Effect of Overfitting Avoidance in Decision Tree Induction, Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92)
- eberhart, 2001, Swarm Intelligence
- 10.1016/B978-1-55860-247-2.50056-5 · DOI
- duda, 2000, Pattern Classification
- 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2025027 · DOI · Paper page
- dembski, 2006, No Free Lunch Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence
- dembski, 2008, The Search for a Search: Measuring the Information Cost of Higher Level Search, International Journal of Information Technology and Intelligent Computing, 3
- 10.1162/evco.1998.6.2.109 · DOI
- davis, 1965, The Undecidable Basic papers on Undecidable propositions unsolvable problems and computable functions
- english, 1996, Evaluation of Evolutionary and Genetic Optimizers: No Free Lunch, Evolutionary Programming V Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 163
- 10.1109/CEC.1999.782013 · DOI
- 10.1109/CEC.2004.1330860 · DOI
- 10.1145/79173.79184 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.14.2794 · DOI
- sivia, 2006, Data Analysis A Bayesian Tutorial
- 1995, Computational Intelligence A Dynamic System Perspective
- 10.1109/TEVC.2004.826074 · DOI
- 10.1109/4235.930318 · DOI
- marks ii, 2009, Handbook of Fourier Analysis and Its Application, 10.1093/oso/9780195335927.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature01568 · DOI
- cover, 2006, Elements of Information Theory
- reed, 1999, Neural Smithing Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks, 10.7551/mitpress/4937.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1090/S0002-9947-1953-0053041-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/4235.873238 · DOI
- schaffer, 1991, Overfitting Avoidance as Bias (preliminary version), Proceedings of Machine Learning IJCAI Workshop on Discovery in Databases
- papoulis, 1991, Probability random variables and stochastic processes, 537
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Is cosmological tuning fine or coarse?
Díaz-Pachón, D. A., Hössjer, O., & Marks II, R. J. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/020 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dembski, W. A., & Marks, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (US)
- Baylor University (US)
- ORCID
- Marks, Robert J.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-10
- Pages
- 2647-2652
- ISSN
- 1062-922X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099939838
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Algorithms and Data Compression
- Keywords
- information conservation, principle of insufficient reason, no free lunch theorem, search algorithms, uniform distribution, search performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review