Cited by 32Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchComputability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsAlgorithms and Data Compression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bernoulli's principle of insufficient reason and conservation of information in computer search

Dembski, William A., Marks, Robert J.·2009·2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

Abstract

Conservation of information (COI) popularized by the no free lunch theorem is a great leveler of search algorithms, showing that on average no search outperforms any other. Yet in practice some searches appear to outperform others. In consequence, some have questioned the significance of COI to the performance of search algorithms. An underlying foundation of COI is Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason(PrOIR) which imposes of a uniform distribution on a search space in the absence of all prior knowledge about the search target or the search space structure. The assumption is conserved under mapping. If the probability of finding a target in a search space is p, then the problem of finding the target in any subset of the search space is p. More generally, all some-to-many mappings of a uniform search space result in a new search space where the chance of doing better than p is 50-50. Consequently the chance of doing worse is 50-50. This result can be viewed as a confirming property of COI. To properly assess the significance of the COI for search, one must completely identify the precise sources of information that affect search performance. This discussion leads to resolution of the seeming conflict between COI and the observation that some search algorithms perform well on a large class of problems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsmc.2009.5346119

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Normalization imposes limitations to Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason (PrOIR).

    “Normalization imposes limitations to Bernoulli's Principle of Insufficient Reason (PrOIR), otherwise known as the Principle of Indifference [17-19].”

    From Is cosmological tuning fine or coarse? (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1016/0167-7152(94)00090-U · DOI
  2. han, 2002, Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for a class of combinatorial optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 580, 10.1109/TEVC.2002.804320 · DOI
  3. ho, 2002, Simple explanation of the no-free-lunch theorem, J Optimiz Theory Appl, 115, 549570, 10.1023/A:1021251113462 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/ICEC.1997.592270 · DOI
  5. ho, 2001, Simple explanantion of the No Free Lunch Theorem, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
  6. jones, 1997, Computability and Complexity From a Programming Perspective, 10.7551/mitpress/2003.001.0001 · DOI
  7. kasner, 2001, Mathematics and the Imagination
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511498480 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TAC.2003.811254 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1 · DOI · Paper page
  11. wolpert, 1992, On the connection between in-sample testing and generalization error, Complex Systems, 6, 47
  12. 10.1109/TEVC.2005.856205 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/4235.585893 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5345941 · DOI
  15. fisher, 1922, Mathematical Theory Of Probabilities & Its Applications To Frequency Curves & Statistical Methods
  16. fogel, 1998, Evolutionary Computation The Fossil Record, 10.1109/9780470544600 · DOI
  17. fogel, 2001, Blondie24 Playing at the Edge of AI
  18. 10.1109/JPROC.2004.837633 · DOI
  19. fogel, 2005, Evolutionary Computation Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence, 10.1002/0471749214 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511609220 · DOI
  21. bertrand, 1896, Calcul des Probabilite?s
  22. bernoulli, 1713, Ars Conjectandi (The Art of Conjecturing)
  23. atlas, 1992, A performance comparison of trained multi-layer perceptrons and classification trees, Neural Networks Theoretical Foundations and Analysis, 284
  24. christensen, 2001, What can we learn from No Free Lunch? A First Attempt to Characterize the Concept of a Searchable, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
  25. go?del, 1932, Zum intuitionistischen Aussagenkalku?l, Anzeiger, 69, 6566
  26. chaitin, 1999, The Unknowable
  27. chaitin, 1997, The Limits of Mathematics
  28. ha?ggstro?m, 2007, Biology and Philosophy, 22, 217, 10.1007/s10539-006-9040-z · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TASSP.1984.1164357 · DOI
  30. zurada, 1994, Computational Intelligence Imitating Life
  31. corne, 2003, No Free Lunch and Free Leftovers Theorems for Multiobjective Optimisation Problems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10.1007/3-540-36970-8_23 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/CBO9780511535499 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1007/BF00993504 · DOI · Paper page
  34. schaffer, 1992, Sparse Data and the Effect of Overfitting Avoidance in Decision Tree Induction, Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92)
  35. eberhart, 2001, Swarm Intelligence
  36. 10.1016/B978-1-55860-247-2.50056-5 · DOI
  37. duda, 2000, Pattern Classification
  38. 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2025027 · DOI · Paper page
  39. dembski, 2006, No Free Lunch Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence
  40. dembski, 2008, The Search for a Search: Measuring the Information Cost of Higher Level Search, International Journal of Information Technology and Intelligent Computing, 3
  41. 10.1162/evco.1998.6.2.109 · DOI
  42. davis, 1965, The Undecidable Basic papers on Undecidable propositions unsolvable problems and computable functions
  43. english, 1996, Evaluation of Evolutionary and Genetic Optimizers: No Free Lunch, Evolutionary Programming V Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 163
  44. 10.1109/CEC.1999.782013 · DOI
  45. 10.1109/CEC.2004.1330860 · DOI
  46. 10.1145/79173.79184 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/nar/28.14.2794 · DOI
  48. sivia, 2006, Data Analysis A Bayesian Tutorial
  49. 1995, Computational Intelligence A Dynamic System Perspective
  50. 10.1109/TEVC.2004.826074 · DOI
  51. 10.1109/4235.930318 · DOI
  52. marks ii, 2009, Handbook of Fourier Analysis and Its Application, 10.1093/oso/9780195335927.001.0001 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nature01568 · DOI
  54. cover, 2006, Elements of Information Theory
  55. reed, 1999, Neural Smithing Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks, 10.7551/mitpress/4937.001.0001 · DOI
  56. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1953-0053041-6 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1109/4235.873238 · DOI
  58. schaffer, 1991, Overfitting Avoidance as Bias (preliminary version), Proceedings of Machine Learning IJCAI Workshop on Discovery in Databases
  59. papoulis, 1991, Probability random variables and stochastic processes, 537

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dembski, W. A., & Marks, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
Venue
2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2009-10
Pages
2647-2652
ISSN
1062-922X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099939838
Cited by
32
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
information conservation, principle of insufficient reason, no free lunch theorem, search algorithms, uniform distribution, search performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review