Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving Log-Based Anomaly Detection with Component-Aware Analysis

Yin, Kun, Yan, Meng, Xu, Ling, Xu, Zhou, Li, Zhao, Yang, Dan, Zhang, Xiaohong·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)

Abstract

Logs are universally available in software systems for troubleshooting. They record system run-time states and messages of system activities. Log analysis is an effective way to diagnosis system exceptions, but it will take a long time for engineers to locate anomalies accurately through logs. Many automatic approaches have been proposed for log-based anomaly detection. However, most of the prior approaches did not consider the corresponding system component of a log message. Such component records the log location, which can help detect the location-sequence-related anomalies. In this paper, we propose LogC, a new Log -based anomaly detection approach with Component-aware analysis. LogC contains two phases: (i) turning log messages into log template sequences and component sequences, (ii) feeding such two sequences to train a combined LSTM model for detecting anomalous logs. LogC only needs normal log sequences to train the combined model. We evaluate LogC on two open-source log datasets: HDFS and ThunderBird. Experimental results show that LogC overall outperforms three baselines (i.e., PCA, IM, and DeepLog) in terms of three metrics (precision, recall, and F-measure).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsme46990.2020.00069

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. du, 2018, Spell: Online streaming parsing of large unstructured system logs, TKDE, 31, 2213
  2. 10.1109/ICAC.2004.1301345 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/2889160.2889232 · DOI
  4. 10.24963/ijcai.2019/658 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1145/3338906.3338931 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/ICDM.2008.132 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/2939672.2939712 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1145/2980024.2872407 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/DSN.2007.103 · DOI
  10. 10.1145/1629575.1629587 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/ISSRE.2016.21 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/ASE.2019.00068 · DOI
  13. lou, 2010, Mining invariants from console logs for system problem detection, USENIX, 1
  14. 10.1145/3133956.3134015 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1145/2983323.2983358 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/MSR.2013.6624054 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/DSN.2010.5544921 · DOI
  18. du, 2015, Behavioral anomaly detection approach based on log monitoring, BESC, 188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Yin, K., Yan, M., Xu, L., Xu, Z., Li, Z., Yang, D., & Zhang, X.
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-09
Pages
667-671
Cited by
37
References
3
Funders
  • Research and Development
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review