Cited by 17Software Testing and Debugging TechniquesSoftware Engineering ResearchSoftware System Performance and Reliability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SBFL-Suitability: A Software Characteristic for Fault Localization

Open access
Sasaki, Yui, Higo, Yoshiki, Matsumoto, Shinsuke, Kusumoto, Shinji·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)

Abstract

Spectrum-Based Fault Localization (in short, SBFL) is one of the popular techniques to localize faulty code fragments of a given program. SBFL utilizes the information about which statements are executed by each of the success or failure test cases. There are various implementation ways for the same functionality if we use high-level programming languages. The authors consider that differences in these implementation ways may affect the efficiency of localizing faults using SBFL. In this paper, we define a characteristic to what extent a program is suitable for SBFL as SBFL-Suitability, and we propose a technique for measuring SBFL-Suitability. The proposed technique generates many slightly-variant programs from a given program with Mutation Testing, and then it measures how accurately SBFL detects the changed program statements in the variant programs. We conducted an experiment to investigate how SBFL-Suitability differs depending on the differences in source code structures. As a result, we found that (1) the fewer statements in the same nesting level, the higher SBFL-Suitability tends to be, and (2) the presence of Early Return improves SBFL-Suitability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsme46990.2020.00076

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1109/TAIC.PART.2007.13 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1134285.1134425 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/2610384.2628053 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/2931037.2948707 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/3019612.3019830 · DOI
  6. coles, 0, PIT
  7. fowler, 1999, Refactoring Improving the Design of Existing Code
  8. boswell, 2011, The Art of Readable Code Simple and Practical Techniques for Writing Better Code
  9. 2011, Systems and software engineering ? Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) ? System and software quality models Std
  10. 10.1145/581396.581397 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TSE.2010.62 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/11531142_23 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/DSN.2002.1029005 · DOI
  14. 10.1147/sj.411.0004 · DOI
  15. 10.1590/S1415-47572004000100014 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sasaki, Y., Higo, Y., Matsumoto, S., & Kusumoto, S.
Affiliations
  • Japan Research Institute (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-09
Pages
702-706
ISSN
1063-6773 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097433885
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM) (publishedVersion)
  • OUKA (Osaka University Knowledge Archive) (Osaka University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H03222, 20H04166)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
Keywords
spectrum-based fault localization, mutation testing, program variants, early returns, source code structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review