The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attribute Selection and Imbalanced Data: Problems in Software Defect Prediction
Abstract
The data mining and machine learning community is often faced with two key problems: working with imbalanced data and selecting the best features for machine learning. This paper presents a process involving a feature selection technique for selecting the important attributes and a data sampling technique for addressing class imbalance. The application domain of this study is software engineering, more specifically, software quality prediction using classification models. When using feature selection and data sampling together, different scenarios should be considered. The four possible scenarios are: (1) feature selection based on original data, and modeling (defect prediction) based on original data; (2) feature selection based on original data, and modeling based on sampled data; (3) feature selection based on sampled data, and modeling based on original data; and (4) feature selection based on sampled data, and modeling based on sampled data. The research objective is to compare the software defect prediction performances of models based on the four scenarios. The case study consists of nine software measurement data sets obtained from the PROMISE software project repository. Empirical results suggest that feature selection based on sampled data performs significantly better than feature selection based on original data, and that defect prediction models perform similarly regardless of whether the training data was formed using sampled or original data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Cited by
A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Prediction Performance in Software Engineering
Hall, T., Beecham, S., Bowes, D., Gray, D., & Counsell, S. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2011.103 · Cited by 1,154
An under‐sampled software defect prediction method based on hybrid multi‐objective cuckoo search
Cai, X., Niu, Y., Geng, S., Zhang, J., Cui, Z., Li, J., & Chen, J. (2020) · Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.5478 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Gao, K., & Seliya, N.
- Venue
- 2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-10
- Pages
- 137-144
- ISSN
- 1082-3409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038464048
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attribute Selection and Imbalanced Data: Problems in Software Defect Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ictai.2010.27
- The paper
- Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Gao, K., & Seliya, N. (2010). Attribute Selection and Imbalanced Data: Problems in Software Defect Prediction. 2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2010.27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.