Cited by 12Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

A hybrid approach for optimal automatic segmentation of White Matter tracts in HARDI

Chekir, Amira, Descoteaux, Maxime, Garyfallidis, Eleftherios, Cote, Marc-Alexandre, Boumghar, Fatima Oulebsir·2014·2014 IEEE Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES)

Abstract

Whole brain tractography generates a very huge dataset composed by various tracts of different shapes, lengths, positions. Then clustering them into anatomically meaningful bundles is a challenge. Until now, several clustering methods have been proposed such as methods based on similarity measures or methods based on anatomical information, but no optimal clustering criteria were found yet. All methods have deficiencies. The combination of appropriate and distinguishable aspects of both methods is recommended to improve the results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a new combined approach that incorporates various features in order on one hand to overcome the size and the complexity of the tractography datasets and the other for more efficacy and precision of clustering results. We propose a hybrid approach for automatic segmentation of White Matter (WM) tracts in HARDI that combines two complementary levels. The first level of our contribution is based on a similarity measure which aims to reduce the dimensionality of the data. The second level embeds a priori knowledge represented by a subject bundle atlas constructed in this work to improve the result of the clustering. Our method is able to well extract 13 major WM bundles. The results accuracy are measured by a Kappa analysis between the proposed method results and bundle atlas. The average Kappa values is superior to 0.70, it suggests substantial agreement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iecbes.2014.7047481

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fiber clustering methods group tractography streamlines according to their geometric trajectories, describing structural connectivity according to white matter anatomy.

    “They group tractography streamlines according to their geometric trajectories, describing the structural connectivity according to the white matter anatomy (Avila et al., 2019; Chekir et al., 2014; Garyfallidis et al., 2018; Guevara et al., 2012; Li et al., 2010; O’Donnell and Westin, 2007; Román et al., 2017; Ros et al., 2013; Siless et al., 2018; 2020; Tunç et al., 2014; Vázquez et al., 2020; Wu”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chekir, A., Descoteaux, M., Garyfallidis, E., Cote, M.-A., & Boumghar, F. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene (DZ)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Venue
2014 IEEE Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-12
Pages
177-180
OpenAlex
W1519724953
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
white matter tract segmentation, high angular resolution diffusion imaging, whole-brain tractography, similarity measures, dimensionality reduction, anatomical prior knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review