The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description for Software-Intensive Systems
Abstract
" This recommended practice addresses the activities of the creation, analysis, and sus-tainment of architectures of software-intensive systems, and the recording of such architectures interms of architectural descriptions . A conceptual framework for architectural description is estab-lished. The content of an architectural description is defined. Annexes provide the rationale for keyconcepts and terminology, the relationships to other standards, and examples of usage. "
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture
Tyree, J., & Akerman, A. (2005) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2005.27 · Cited by 459
Controlling software architecture erosion: A survey
de Silva, L., & Balasubramaniam, D. (2012) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.036 · Cited by 184
Industry experiences with large-scale refactoring
Ivers, J., Nord, R. L., Ozkaya, I., Seifried, C., Timperley, C. S., & Kessentini, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3540250.3558954 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2000-09-21
- OpenAlex
- W4245799542
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- Type
- standard
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description for Software-Intensive Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ieeestd.2000.91944
- The paper
- IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description for Software-Intensive Systems. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.2000.91944
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
