Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37Phonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesVoice and Speech DisordersDysphagia Assessment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automated classification of swallowing and breadth sounds

Aboofazeli, M., Moussavi, Z.·2005·The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

Abstract

The goal of this study was to develop an automated and objective method to separate swallowing sounds from breath sounds. Swallowing sound detection can be utilized as part of a system for swallowing mechanism assessment and diagnosis of swallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) by acoustical means. In this study, an algorithm based on multilayer feed forward neural networks is proposed for decomposition of tracheal sound into swallowing and respiratory segments. Among many features examined, root-mean-square of the signal, the average power of the signal over 150-450 Hz and waveform fractal dimension were selected features applied to the neural network as inputs. Findings from previous studies about temporal and durational patterns of swallowing and respiration were used in a smart algorithm for further identification of the swallow and breath segments. The proposed method was applied to 18 tracheal sound recordings of 7 healthy subjects (ages 13-30 years, 4 males). The results were validated manually by visual inspection using airflow measurement and spectrogram of the sounds and auditory means. The algorithm was able to detect 91.7% of swallows correctly. The average of missed swallows and average of false detection were 8.3% and 9.5%, respectively. With additional preprocessing and post processing, the proposed method may be used for automated extraction of swallowing sounds from breath sounds in healthy and dysphagic individuals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iembs.2004.1404069

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. lazareck, 2002, Adaptive swallowing sound segmentation by variance dimension, Proc Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conf
  2. rempel, 1999, The effect of altering the consistency of food on the breath and swallow pattern of young people with cerebral palsy, presented at the 53rd Annual congress of American Academy for cerebral palsy and developmental Medicine

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aboofazeli, M., & Moussavi, Z.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Venue
The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-04-12
Volume
4
Pages
3816-3819
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2533466077
Cited by
37
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
lung sounds, dysphagia, tracheal sounds, multilayer perceptron, acoustic features, air flow measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.