Cited by 132Innovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsWireless Body Area Networks

Energy harvesting for human wearable and implantable bio-sensors

Mitcheson, P D·2010·2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology

Abstract

There are clear trade-offs between functionality, battery lifetime and battery volume for wearable and implantable wireless-biosensors which energy harvesting devices may be able to overcome. Reliable energy harvesting has now become a reality for machine condition monitoring and is finding applications in chemical process plants, refineries and water treatment works. However, practical miniature devices that can harvest sufficient energy from the human body to power a wireless bio-sensor are still in their infancy. This paper reviews the options for human energy harvesting in order to determine power availability for harvester-powered body sensor networks. The main competing technologies for energy harvesting from the human body are inertial kinetic energy harvesting devices and thermoelectric devices. These devices are advantageous to some other types as they can be hermetically sealed. In this paper the fundamental limit to the power output of these devices is compared as a function of generator volume when attached to a human whilst walking and running. It is shown that the kinetic energy devices have the highest fundamental power limits in both cases. However, when a comparison is made between the devices using device effectivenesses figures from previously demonstrated prototypes presented in the literature, the thermal device is competitive with the kinetic energy harvesting device when the subject is running and achieves the highest power density when the subject is walking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iembs.2010.5627952

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current wireless power transfer and energy harvesting approaches lack the power transfer rates needed for increasing volumes of communicated data and rates along with stimulation power of implantable technologies.

    “Current approaches include wireless power transfer (Agarwal etal. 2017) and energy harvesting (Mitcheson 2010) but currently lack the power transfer rates needed for the increasing volumes of communicated data and rates along with stimulation power of implantable technologies.”

    From Peripheral nerve bionic interface: a review of electrodes (2019) · cites this paper as Mitcheson 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitcheson, P. D.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Mitcheson, P D
Venue
2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-08
Volume
2010
Pages
3432-3436
ISSN
2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964376276
Cited by
132
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G070180/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
energy harvesting, wearable sensors, implantable sensors, wireless biosensors, wireless body area networks, kinetic energy harvesting, thermoelectric devices, power density, walking and running, battery life
MeSH terms
Bioelectric Energy Sources, Energy Transfer, Equipment Design, Humans, Electric Power Supplies, Biosensing Techniques, Computer-Aided Design, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review