Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer

Open access
Jimenez, Yury, Cervello-Pastor, Cristina, Garcia, Aurelio J.·2014·2014 IFIP Networking Conference

Abstract

The software-defined network (SDN) advocates a centralized network control, where a controller manages a network from a global view of the network. Large SDN networks may consist of multiple controllers or controller domains that distribute the network management between them, where each controller has a logically centralized but physically distributed vision of the network. In this context, a key challenge faced by providers is to define a scalable control network that exploits the benefits of SDN when used in conjunction with efficient management strategies. Most of the control layer models proposed are not concerned with controller scalability, because they assume that commercial controllers are scalable in terms of capacity (quantity of flows processed per second). However, it has been demonstrated that overloads and long propagation delays among controllers and controllers-switches can lead to a long response time of the controllers, affecting their ability to respond to network events in a very short time and reducing the reliability of communication. In this work we define the principles for designing a scalable control layer for SDN, and show the desired control layer characteristics that optimize the management of the network. We address these principles from the perspective of the controller placement problem. For this purpose we improve and evaluate our previous approach, the algorithm called k-Critical. K-Critical discovers the minimum number of controllers and their location to create a robust control topology that deals robustly with failures and balances the load among the selected controllers. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our solution by comparing it with other controller placement solutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ifipnetworking.2014.6857117

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Jimenez, Y., Cervello-Pastor, C., & Garcia, A. J.
Venue
2014 IFIP Networking Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
1-9
OpenAlex
W2107944181
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
10.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ifipnetworking.2014.6857117
The paper
Jimenez, Y., Cervello-Pastor, C., & Garcia, A. J. (2014). On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer. 2014 IFIP Networking Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/ifipnetworking.2014.6857117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.