The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer
Open accessAbstract
The software-defined network (SDN) advocates a centralized network control, where a controller manages a network from a global view of the network. Large SDN networks may consist of multiple controllers or controller domains that distribute the network management between them, where each controller has a logically centralized but physically distributed vision of the network. In this context, a key challenge faced by providers is to define a scalable control network that exploits the benefits of SDN when used in conjunction with efficient management strategies. Most of the control layer models proposed are not concerned with controller scalability, because they assume that commercial controllers are scalable in terms of capacity (quantity of flows processed per second). However, it has been demonstrated that overloads and long propagation delays among controllers and controllers-switches can lead to a long response time of the controllers, affecting their ability to respond to network events in a very short time and reducing the reliability of communication. In this work we define the principles for designing a scalable control layer for SDN, and show the desired control layer characteristics that optimize the management of the network. We address these principles from the perspective of the controller placement problem. For this purpose we improve and evaluate our previous approach, the algorithm called k-Critical. K-Critical discovers the minimum number of controllers and their location to create a robust control topology that deals robustly with failures and balances the load among the selected controllers. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our solution by comparing it with other controller placement solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 · Cited by 11,675
Consistent updates for software-defined networks: change you can believe in!
Reitblatt, M., Foster, N., Rexford, J., & Walker, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks · doi:10.1145/2070562.2070569 · Cited by 163
Cited by
A survey: Control plane scalability issues and approaches in Software-Defined Networking (SDN)
Karakus, M., & Durresi, A. (2017) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.017 · Cited by 373
Hybrid SDN evolution: A comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art
Khorsandroo, S., Sánchez, A. G., Tosun, A. S., Arco, J., & Doriguzzi-Corin, R. (2021) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107981 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Jimenez, Y., Cervello-Pastor, C., & Garcia, A. J.
- Venue
- 2014 IFIP Networking Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-06
- Pages
- 1-9
- OpenAlex
- W2107944181
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ifipnetworking.2014.6857117
- The paper
- Jimenez, Y., Cervello-Pastor, C., & Garcia, A. J. (2014). On the controller placement for designing a distributed SDN control layer. 2014 IFIP Networking Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/ifipnetworking.2014.6857117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.