Cloudlet network design optimization
Abstract
Major interest is currently given to the integration of clusters of virtualization servers, also referred to as `cloudlets', into the access network to allow higher performance and reliability in the access to mobile cloud services. We tackle the cloudlet network design problem for mobile access networks. The model is such that virtual machines are associated with mobile users and are allocated to cloudlets. Designing a cloudlet network implies first determining where to install cloudlet facilities among the available sites, then assigning sets of access points such as base-stations to cloudlets, while supporting virtual machine migrations and taking into account partial user mobility information, as well as the satisfaction of service-level agreements. We present link-path formulations supported by heuristics to compute solutions in reasonable time. We qualify the advantage in considering mobility for both users and virtual machines as up to 40% less cloudlet facilities to install and 40% less virtual machine migrations to execute. We compare two migration modes, bulk and live migration, as a function of mobile cloud service requirements, determining that a high preference should be given to bulk migrations for delay-stringent services such as augmented reality support, while for applications with less stringent delay requirements, live migration appears as largely preferable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An optimized cloudlet network demonstrated advantages in traffic volume and reduction of latency.
“While these authors did not explicitly compare MEC and Cloud performance parameters, the results demonstrated advantages in an optimized “cloudlet network” in terms of traffic volume and reduction of latency [144].”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
The problem addressed in the simulated cloudlet network study was more related to MEC and/or micro data centers than to cloudlets because so many devices were included in the network.
“The results suggest, however, that the problem addressed in that study was more related to MEC and/or mDCs than to cloudlets because so many devices were included in the network.”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
MEC could generate large amounts of data from users, but user requirements for storage and computational resources still need accurate definitions.
“MEC could generate large amounts of data from users [144], but user requirements for storage and computational resources still need accurate definitions.”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
Different network architectures will be required for different edge computing scenarios.
“Different network architectures will also be required for these different scenarios [125,133,144,204].”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [144]
Cites
The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing
Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., & Davies, N. (2009) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2009.82 · Cited by 3,660 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S., & Sabella, D. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2705720 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Singh, R., & Gill, S. S. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.02.004 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
A Survey of Virtual Machine Management in Edge Computing
Tao, Z., Xia, Q., Hao, Z., Li, C., Ma, L., Yi, S., & Li, Q. (2019) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2927919 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ceselli, A., Premoli, M., & Secci, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Venue
- 2015 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-05
- Pages
- 1-9
- OpenAlex
- W1533110991
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 8.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Keywords
- mobile cloud services, access networks, virtual machine placement, virtual machine migration, live migration, user mobility, service level agreements, heuristics, base station assignment, augmented reality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review