Cited by 3Impact of Light on Environment and HealthHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisRegional Economics and Spatial Analysis

Blinded by the Light: Monitoring Local Economic Development Over Time With Nightlight Emissions

Open access
Kondmann, Lukas, Taubenbock, Hannes, Zhu, Xiao Xiang·2021·2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS

Abstract

Nighttime light (NTL) emissions are widely used across disciplines to map the spatial distribution of a variety of socioeconomic variables. For economic studies, NTLs allow to proxy for levels of economic indicators at the country level as well as the local level. Further, multi-temporal differences in NTL intensity are also related to GDP differences on the country level. In this study, we investigate if this relation in temporal differences also holds for the local level. We test this with DMSP as well as VIIRS NTLs data from 2010–2015 in Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda. Even though we successfully map local levels of socio-economic status with NTLs, we find multi-temporal changes in NTLs at this local level to be uncorrelated with socio-economic development over time. We conclude that luminosity values based on current DMSP and VIIRS sensors are no silver bullet in measuring local economic changes over time and should, if at all, only be used with caution for this.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/igarss47720.2021.9554428

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Random forest regression is a powerful tool to map the spatial distribution of humanitarian indicators with NTLs accurately.

    “Second, we employ random forest regression which is a powerful tool to map the spatial distribution of humanitarian indicators with NTLsaccurately [18, 26].”

    From Under the Radar -- Auditing Fairness in ML for Humanitarian Mapping (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Results report a strong spatial association between nighttime lights and local wealth and consumption, supporting the NTL-mapping part of the claim. The Methods specify linear regression, not random forest regression, so this paper does not support the claim about that method’s accuracy. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The R2 values in Table 2 are generally slightly lower than ranges reported in previous studies.

    “Compared to previous studies of economic activity and nightlights, 𝑅 2 in Table 2 are in general slightly lower than ranges in previous studies [7, 15, 18, 29].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W Matthew Davis, David B Lobell, and Stefano Ermon, "Com- bining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty," Science, vol. 353, pp. 790-794, 2016.
  2. Vernon Henderson, Adam Storeygard, and David Weil, "Measuring economic growth from outer space," Ameri- can Economic Review, vol. 102, pp. 994-1028, 2012.
  3. Lukas Kondmann, Matthias Haeberle, and Xiao Xiang Zhu, "Combining twitter and earth observation data for local poverty mapping," in NeuRIPS Machine Learning for the Developing World Workshop, 2020, pp. 1-5.
  4. Lukas Kondmann and Xiao Xiang Zhu, "Measuring changes in poverty with deep learning and satellite im- agery," ICLR 1st Workshop on Practical ML for Devel- oping Countries, 2020.
  5. Mia M Bennett and Laurence C Smith, "Advances in using multitemporal night-time lights satellite imagery to detect, estimate, and monitor socioeconomic dynamics," Remote Sensing of Environment, pp. 176-197, 2017.
  6. Christopher Yeh, Anthony Perez, Anne Driscoll, George Azzari, Zhongyi Tang, David Lobell, Stefano Ermon, and Marshall Burke, "Using publicly available satellite im- agery and deep learning to understand economic well- being in africa," Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2020.
  7. Stelios Michalopoulos and Elias Papaioannou, "Spatial patterns of development: A meso approach," Annual Re- view of Economics, vol. 10, pp. 383-410, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kondmann, L., Taubenbock, H., & Zhu, X. X.
Affiliations
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-07-11
Pages
5708-5711
OpenAlex
W3206495318
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (ERC) (ERC-2016-StG-714087)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
nighttime lights, local economic development, socio-economic development, dimethylsulfoniopropionate, VIIRS, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review