The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IEEE standard review — Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems
Abstract
In September 2009, the IEEE Board of Directors approved the new IEEE tagline - Advancing Technology for Humanity - as recommended by the IEEE Public Visibility Committee. Aligned with the IEEE tagline, IEEE Standards Association takes the initiative to address ethics in engineering design under “Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Wellbeing with Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems” focusing on Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems (AI/AS). The intention is to cover, as much as possible, the ethical concerns on AI/AS through a rigorous regard to the problem from different perspectives. The ultimate objective of this ongoing initiative is to provide guidelines/procedures/standards to prioritize human wellbeing in the forthcoming evolutions on artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. This article reviews different aspects addressed in Version 1 of this initiative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
Fairness definitions explained
Verma, S., & Rubin, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness · doi:10.1145/3194770.3194776 · Cited by 1,124
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.
Murphy, K., Di Ruggiero, E., Upshur, R., Willison, D. J., Malhotra, N., Cai, J. C., Malhotra, N., Lui, V., & Gibson, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8 · Cited by 435
The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review
Burr, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8 · Cited by 374
Should ChatGPT be biased? Challenges and risks of bias in large language models
Ferrara, E. (2023) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v28i11.13346 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahriari, K., & Shahriari, M.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 197-201
- OpenAlex
- W2762694293
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IEEE standard review — Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ihtc.2017.8058187
- The paper
- Shahriari, K., & Shahriari, M. (2017). IEEE standard review — Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. 2017 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ihtc.2017.8058187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
