Cited by 52Photovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersPower Systems and Renewable Energy

Advanced perturbation and observation (P&O) based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a solar photo-voltaic system

Sharma, D. K., Purohit, G.·2012·2012 IEEE 5th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE)

Abstract

In this paper, a novel algorithm based MPPT has been suggested for extracting maximum possible power from PV module. The proposed algorithm for controlling the MPPT is based upon the mostly used Perturb and Observe (P&O) method. Along with the proposed algorithm, different existing algorithms have been compared in terms of their tracking speed and implementation complexity. The solar module characteristics (I-V and P-V) have been simulated in MATLAB. The simulation results for various parameters of boost converter have also been obtained. In this paper, we discuss the results of our study of an improved maximum power point tracker (MPPT) of a PV system. The proposed MPPT algorithm is based on the incremental perturbation and observation (IP&O) strategy in which the perturbation steps have been increased to get closer to the maximum power point with minimum possible oscillations. The PV power system, using the proposed MPPT, will be able to optimally track maximum power points with minimum possible oscillation around maximum power points (MPPs). Consequently the light to electricity conversion efficiency can be improved significantly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iicpe.2012.6450411

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xin et al. [150] and Sato et al. [151] have presented performance evaluation and prediction of InGaP/GaAs/Ge 3-J solar cells under the irradiation environment.

    “Xin et al. [150] and Sato et al. [151] have presented performance evaluation and prediction of InGaP/GaAs/Ge 3-J solar cells under the irradiation environment.”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [151]

  • By calculating the open-circuit voltage and the short-circuit current, the degradation curves show an accuracy of 5%, which is a good agreement with experimental data.

    “By calculating the open-circuit voltage and the short-circuit current, the degradation curves show an accuracy of 5%, which is a good agreement with experimental data.”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [151]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 52

Authors
Sharma, D. K., & Purohit, G.
Affiliations
Sir Padampat Singhania University (IN)
Venue
2012 IEEE 5th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-12
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W2033390848
Cited by
52
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
4.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE India International Conference on Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
Keywords
maximum power point tracking, perturb and observe, photovoltaic systems, boost converter, MPPT algorithm comparison, oscillation reduction, conversion efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review