Cited by 14Smart Grid Security and ResilienceInformation and Cyber SecurityCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies

Modeling cyber attacks on a critical infrastructure scenario

Ciancamerla, E., Minichino, M., Palmieri, S.·2013·IISA 2013

Abstract

Critical infrastructures, such as electrical grids, are monitored and controlled by SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) systems. Cyber attacks against SCADA might put CI and in turn industrial production, environment integrity and human safety at risk. Here, with reference to an actual case study, constituted by an electrical grid, its SCADA system and a corporate network, we discuss how cyber threats, vulnerabilities and attacks might degrade the functionalities of SCADA and corporate network and, in turn, lead to outages of the electrical grid. We represent SCADA and corporate network under malware propagation, Denial of Service and Man In The Middle attacks, and predict their consequent functionalities. Particularly, we use Netlogo to identify possible malware propagation in relation to SCADA & corporate security policies adopted from the utility and NS2 simulator to compute the consequences of such cyber attacks on SCADA and in turn on electrical grid functionalities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iisa.2013.6623699

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IDS work by inspecting the network traffic and mainly comprise of two approaches: signature based and anomaly based.

    “IDS work by inspecting the network traffic and mainly comprise of two approaches: signature based and anomaly based.”
  • The signature detection matches traffic to a known misuse pattern, while the anomaly detection works on the normalities in the observed data and can detect unknown attacks.

    “The signature detection matches traffic to a known misuse pattern, while the anomaly detection works on the normalities in the observed data and can detect unknown attacks [14], [15].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ciancamerla, E., Minichino, M., & Palmieri, S.
Affiliations
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT)
Venue
IISA 2013
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-07
Volume
s4
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W1968647112
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) (publishedVersion)
  • ENEA Open Archive (National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Keywords
cyberattacks, critical infrastructure, SCADA systems, power grid, malware propagation, denial-of-service attacks, man-in-the-middle attacks, corporate networks, network security vulnerabilities, power outages, NetLogo simulation, NS-2 simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review