Sentiment Classification of Chinese Traveler Reviews by Support Vector Machine Algorithm
Abstract
Nowadays, online word-of-mouth has turned to be a very important resource for electronic businesses. How to analyze user generated reviews and to classify them into different sentiment classes is gradually becoming a question that people pay close attention to. In this field, special challenges are associated with the mining of traveler reviews. At present, there is some research on sentiment analysis for English traveler generated reviews, but very few studies pay attention to sentiment analysis for traveler reviews in Chinese. China is the largest country in terms of the number of Internet users. Internet technologies are gradually playing more and more important roles for many industries including tourism industry. The lack of sentiment analysis methods will block the use of word-of-mouth for tourism industry in China. To solve the problem, this study conducts an exploring research on sentiment analysis to Chinese traveler reviews by support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. The experiment data of Chinese reviews for hotels are downloaded from www.ctrip.com, the largest online travel agency in China. Empirical results indicate that, comparing to prior studies on English reviews, SVM algorithm can gain a very well performance of sentiment classification for traveler reviews in Chinese.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of tourism-related sentiment analysis studies used a binary polarity classification.
“The results indicate that the majority of tourism-related sentiment analysis studies used a binary polarity classification (e.g., Zheng & Ye, 2009;Ye et al., 2009;Gindl et al., 2010;Shimada et al., 2011;Zhang et al., 2011;Bjorkelund et al., 2012;Kang et al., 2012).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Zheng & Ye, 2009
Most studies have used data written in English for sentiment analysis, but few used reviews written in Chinese, Spanish and German.
“Most studies have used data written in English for sentiment analysis, but few used reviews written in Chinese, Spanish and German (Zheng & Ye, 2009;Tan & Wu, 2011;Garcia et al, 2012;Kasper & Vela, 2011;Zhang et al., 2011).”
From Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data (2019) · cites this paper as Zheng & Ye, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data
Alaei, A. R., Becken, S., & Stantic, B. (2019) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517747753 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zheng, W., & Ye, Q.
- Affiliations
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Venue
- 2009 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W2168231245
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligent Information Technology Application (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- sentiment classification, Chinese text, online reviews, support vector machine, word of mouth, hotel reviews, tourism industry, user-generated content, Ctrip
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review