The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Face spoofing detection from single images using micro-texture analysis
Open accessAbstract
Current face biometric systems are vulnerable to spoo ing attacks. A spoofing attack occurs when a person tries to masquerade as someone else by falsifying data and thereby gaining illegitimate access. Inspired by image quality assessment, characterization of printing artifacts, and differences in light reflection, we propose to approach the problem of spoofing detection from texture analysis point of view. Indeed, face prints usually contain printing quality defects that can be well detected using texture features. Hence, we present a novel approach based on analyzing facial image textures for detecting whether there is a live person in front of the camera or a face print. The proposed approach analyzes the texture of the facial images using multi-scale local binary patterns (LBP). Compared to many previous works, our proposed approach is robust, computationally fast and does not require user-cooperation. In addition, the texture features that are used for spoofing detection can also be used for face recognition. This provides a unique feature space for coupling spoofing detection and face recognition. Extensive experimental analysis on a publicly avail able database showed excellent results compared to existing works.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398
Cited by
(2012) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 826
Presentation Attack Detection Methods for Face Recognition Systems: A Comprehensive Survey
Ramachandra, R., & Busch, C. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3038924 · Cited by 332
Deep Tree Learning for Zero-Shot Face Anti-Spoofing
Liu, Y., Stehouwer, J., Jourabloo, A., & Liu, X. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00481 · Cited by 278
Regularized Fine-Grained Meta Face Anti-Spoofing
Shao, R., Lan, X., & Yuen, P. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6873 · Cited by 196
SWAPPED! Digital face presentation attack detection via weighted local magnitude pattern
Agarwal, A., Singh, R., Vatsa, M., & Noore, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) · doi:10.1109/btas.2017.8272754 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Maatta, J., Hadid, A., & Pietikainen, M.
- Venue
- 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-10
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W2107227001
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Face spoofing detection from single images using micro-texture analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ijcb.2011.6117510
- The paper
- Maatta, J., Hadid, A., & Pietikainen, M. (2011). Face spoofing detection from single images using micro-texture analysis. 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB). https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcb.2011.6117510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.